Democrat Advocate And Election Worker ARRESTED In Maricopa County, AZ. They cheated in the 2022 election and they had this criminal steal the fobs, to remove the evidence. Man, these election thefts take a long time to prove, every single action they take is to divert from the real issues.

I hope Republicans can think as evilly as these people do and see the plans and the ways they will do it. Republicans are too innocent in a way, sure they cheat, but they never cheat at the scale that Democrats cheat. Now the Republican leadership is different, they will go along with the cheat if it's someone they don't want in the House or the Senate

9:35

https://rumble.com/embed/v51bvol/?pub=4

Democrat Advocate And Election Worker ARRESTED In Maricopa County, AZ. They cheated in the 2022 election and they had this criminal steal the fobs, to remove the evidence. Man, these election thefts take a long time to prove, every single action they take is to divert from the real issues.

I hope Republicans can think as evilly as these people do and see the plans and the ways they will do it. Republicans are too innocent in a way, sure they cheat, but they never cheat at the scale that Democrats cheat. Now the Republican leadership is different, they will go along with the cheat if it's someone they don't want in the House or the Senate

9:35

https://rumble.com/embed/v51bvol/?pub=4

LIVE: Maricopa County officials provide update on arrest of election workerThey are all involved,

10:22

Here we go again, the officials that allowed the 2020 and 2022 elections be stolen are still in charge. may these people be arrested and charged for all the laws they are violated. Once again Maricopa Republicans are aligning with Democrats in AZ. Richterand the bozo are pushing down the obvious implications.

https://rumble.com/embed/v51cm90/?pub=4

>>21087712 =1/3==

Reminder all the cheating in the elections for the last 3-4 cycles are conspiracy theories== Don't forget because these assholes are in charge of the cheating

==fact check: No evidence 'lost votes' or 'ghost votes' affected Arizona's election outcome

Daniel Funke==

The claim: Thousands of 'lost votes' and 'ghost votes' in Arizona indicate the 2020 election was stolen

The votes have been counted, recounted and audited. Federal, state and local elections officials have confirmed the result: Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election.

But online, some conspiracy theorists are still claiming voter fraud helped put Biden in the White House.

"BREAKING – HUGE: Results of Canvassing in Arizona Released – ELECTION STEAL IS NOW CONFIRMED," reads the headline on a Sept. 8 article from theGateway Pundit, a conservative website that has previously published misinformation about election fraud.

The article accumulated nearly 7,000 shares on Facebook within two days, according to CrowdTangle, a social media insights tool. Similar articles and posts have racked up tens of thousands of interactions. Prep for the polls: See who is running for president and compare where they stand on key issues in our Voter Guide

The Gateway Pundit article is based on an 11-page canvassing report from Liz Harris, an Arizona real estate broker and Republican who unsuccessfully ran for office in 2020. Among its claims: There were more than 173,000 "lost votes" and 96,000 "ghost votes" in Maricopa County, home of Phoenix.Fact check:MyPillow CEO Mike Lindellspreads false claim about Arizona election results

"Two primary categories of ineligible ballots and election mishandling, encompassing hundreds of thousands of votes, render the 2020 General Election in Maricopa County uncertifiable," reads the beginning of the report.

They don't FOR Azona and Congress have both certified Biden's win. Local elections officials, media outlets, independent fact-checking organizations and legitimate election experts have refuted Harris' report. There is no evidence widespread voter fraud affected the election outcome in Arizona.

"It reminds me of Mark Twain's quote regarding lies, damn lies and statistics," Kenneth Fernandez, a political science professor at the College of Southern Nevada, said in an email.

USA TODAY reached out to the Gateway Pundit and Harris for comment. The audit of Maricopa County's ballots from the 2020 general election continues on July 24, 2021, in the Wesley Bolin Building at the Arizona State Fairgrounds in Phoenix, Ariz. Report doesn't prove 'lost votes' claim

Arizona elections officials and survey experts have debunked the report's claim about "lost votes" in Maricopa County.

“The allegations presented in this so-called report are baseless and were quickly disproven by local media," Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, said in a statement emailed to USA TODAY. "It’s yet another attempt to undermine the integrity of our elections."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/15/fact-check-arizona-voter-fraud-not-proven-viral-canvassing-report/8262315002/

>>21087866

2/3

The canvassing report is based on data from 4,570 registered voters in Maricopa County. The claim of "lost votes" stems from 964 interviews with people whom the county indicated did not cast a ballot in the election.

Volunteers working with Harris found that, of that group, about 34% said they had actually voted.

Fact check: No evidence of 8 million 'excess' Biden votes from 2020 election

"Overall, there were 505,709 people in the county registered to vote who did not have a vote recorded in the election," reads the report. "Extrapolating these results to the entire county, which can be done at a scientifically correlated confidence level of 95%, it is estimated that 173,104 voters had their votes stolen."

Experts told USA TODAY there are a couple of things wrong with that conclusion. (What experts?) Since there was a "full" canvass in one part of Maricopa County and partial canvasses with different sampling rates in other areas, "not every registered voter was equally likely to be surveyed," said Philip Stark, a statistics professor at the University of California-Berkeley.

"Unless the sample was appropriately random and nonresponse was low and taken into account appropriately, there's no basis for extrapolation from the sample to the county as a whole," he said in an email. "A 'partial canvass' is not a random sample."

==Fact check: Arizona audit hasn't found 275,000 fraudulent votes;; Stark, who has helped develop methods for auditing elections, also said the response rate in the report is "so low that nothing useful could be said about the county as a whole even if the sample had been truly random."

"Only 4,570 of 11,708 attempted contacts gave data. That's a 61% nonresponse rate," he said. —-__"That makes the estimates and confidence intervals meaningless."Then there are problems with the general approach of Harris and her volunteers. Research indicates post-election surveys regularly overestimate voter turnout because people tend to exaggerate their voting behavior. Fernandez said panel studies have found voters "even change their story in who they voted for, sometimes switching their story and recalling that they voted for the winner of the election."

"The bottom line is that what Ms. Harris has found in Arizona is simply another example of turnout over-reportingthat we see in pretty much every single election survey," Brian Schaffner, a professor of civic studies at Tufts University, said in an email. "This is not evidence of lost votes, but rather just another example of how people tell little white lies to make themselves look better when answering surveys."

Audit spokesperson Randy Pullen (center) looks through paperwork, July 19, 2021, in the Wesley Bolin Building at the Arizona State Fairgrounds, Phoenix.

Claim of 'ghost votes' also debunked Local media outlets and elections officials have also refuted the report's claim that there were more than 96,000 "ghost votes" in Maricopa County.

The claim is based on data from 3,606 registered voters whom Maricopa County indicated had voted in the election, 2,897 of them by mail. Of that group, Harris and her volunteers found 164 mail-in voters who were "unknown to the resident or known but having moved prior to the election registration deadline."

"This represents 5.66% of all mail-in voters on which data was gathered," reads the report. "Overall, there were 1,702,981 mail-in votes tallied by the in (sic) the election. Extrapolating these results to the entire county, which can be done at a scientifically correlated confidence level of 95%, it is

estimated that 96,389 mail-in ballots should not have been cast due to this issue."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/15/fact-check-arizona-voter-fraud-not-proven-viral-canvassing-report/8262315002/

>>21087873

3/3

Data collection issues aside, the only examples Harris gave in the report didn't check out.

The original cover photo of the report claimed to show a "vacant lot … that cast two mail-in ballots."But both Stephen Richer, the Republican recorder of Maricopa County, and Garrett Archer, a data analyst for KNXV-TV, found a home that had been on that site since 2005, according to records from the Maricopa County Assessor's Office.

Harris later changed the cover photo to show another vacant lot that purportedly cast a mail-in vote in 2020. But that example was quickly debunked, too. "There is a valid registered voter at that address and a mobile home park in December of 2019," Archer tweeted Sept. 8.

After reaching out to the Maricopa County Elections Department, Archer wrote in a follow-up tweet that the lot was "a mobile home park in 2020 before it was demolished" and the voter in question "requested the ballot be sent to a temporary address."

Election data reported by KNXV-TV indicates 2,089,756 voters were checked in and 2,089,563 ballots were counted in Maricopa County during the election. The discrepancy is due to rare occurrences like mail-in votes not containing ballots, elections officials told the TV station.

"It is irresponsible and silly to claim 100,000+ errors and offer only 2 alleged inaccuracies, both of which are easily debunked," Richer tweeted Sept. 8.

USA TODAY reached out to Maricopa County for comment, but it did not provide one on the record.

No evidence of fraud in Arizona election. Claims that thousands of fraudulent votes affected the 2020 election outcome in Arizona haven't panned out.

Multiple hand counts have confirmed the election results in Maricopa County, which went for Biden by more than 45,000 votes. A forensic audit of voting machines found no malfeasance. Lawsuits challenging Arizona's election outcome have been dismissed and rejected.

The Associated Press reported in mid-July that, of the more than 3 million ballots cast in Arizona, elections officials have found fewer than 200 cases of potential voter fraud.

"Maricopa County stands by the results reported by its elections professionals, confirmed by hand counts, two independent audits, and several court challenges, and certified by the Secretary of State, Governor, and Congress," Jason Berry, a spokesperson for Maricopa County, previously told USA TODAY.

Our rating: False

Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that thousands of "lost votes" and "ghost votes" in Arizona indicate the 2020 election was stolen. State elections officials from both political parties have refuted the findings in Harris' report, as have local media outlets. Political science and statistics experts told USA TODAY the report's methodology is flawed and cannot be used to make conclusions about Arizona's election outcome. There is no evidence widespread voter fraud affected the state's results in 2020

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/15/fact-check-arizona-voter-fraud-not-proven-viral-canvassing-report/8262315002/

We pray to you our Almighty Father God, that your power, truth, love and wisdom will reveal the entire lie, and all involved including the Media be punished by your heavenly and exact power, regardless if they believe in you or not, they have no way out

(They all deserve what is coming, because if they don't get their just punishment, our voting systems will never elect the nominees that citizens want in office. They are trying to normalize this cheating on both sides, and I hope to God this doesn't happen, because we are very close now to a Third World Country, that punishes their own for disagreement)

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/15/fact-check-arizona-voter-fraud-not-proven-viral-canvassing-report/8262315002/

(My vote the first to be prosecuted and put in jail and get harsh punishment is the Media personalities that intentionally lied about everything, they were the mouthpiece and they deserve the worst punishment, from God's Almighty hand. They stole all logic and understanding from good souls and so they should get the first punishment.)

Boebert: Uniparty Lost Once, We Will Beat Them Again TodayGOD BLESS MAGA

5:40

https://rumble.com/embed/v51e4e0/?pub=4

Lindell: Robin Vos Will Be Recalled; Announced Today. Lindell NEVER gives up, this has to get through, he is blocking Trump and Trump Candidates in every way he can. And he backed the steal of 2020

Anons pray for Mike or help his business or both, this a man of God and he believes with all of his heart and soul, and he will never betray our President PDJT.

1:43

https://rumble.com/embed/v51e6pk/?pub=4

Lindell: Robin Vos Will Be Recalled; Announced Today. Lindell NEVER gives up, this has to get through, Vos is blocking Trump and Trump Candidates in every way he can. And he backed the steal of 2020

Anons pray for Mike or help his business or both, this a man of God and he believes with all of his heart and soul, and he will never betray our President PDJT.

1:43

https://rumble.com/embed/v51e6pk/?pub=4

>>21088103

Robin Vos recall, Wisconsin State Assembly (2024)

An effort to recall Robin Vos (R) from his position representing District 63 in the Wisconsin State Assembly was launched on March 27, 2024. Supporters of the recall had 60 days—or no later than May 28, 2024—to collect 6,850 signatures to require a recall election.[1] On May 28, 2024, proponents of the recall announced they had submitted over 9,000 signatures before the deadline.[2] The staff at the Wisconsin Elections Commission verified on June 25 that the recall committee submitted 6,866 valid signatures — 16 more than necessary.[3]

The commission will meet on June 27 to vote on whether to call a recall election. The main issue to be addressed in the meeting is whether the signatures for the recall effort should originate from the district where Vos was elected in 2022 or from his newly created district under the 2024 election maps. If the commission decides to use the old district maps, the petitioners have collected enough signatures to trigger a recall. However, if the new maps are used, the petitioners fall about 3,000 signatures short.[4]

This recall marks the second petition filed against Vos this year. The first recall petition was initiated on January 10, with a deadline set for March 11. Supporters failed to gather sufficient signatures to trigger a recall election.[5][6][7] On March 12, 2024, the Wisconsin Elections Commission staff determined in their initial assessment that the first recall attempt lacked sufficient signatures from residents within the district where Vos was elected to when the recall process was initiated. The organizers fell short by approximately 945 signatures.[8] A final review of the first recall found that 4,989 valid signatures were collected from the old Assembly District 63, 3,053 valid signatures from the new Assembly District 33, and 5,472 valid signatures from the new Assembly District 66.[9]

In December 2023, the Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that the new state legislative boundary maps were unconstitutional and deemed ineligible for future electoral use.[10] In February 2024, Gov. Tony Evers (D) signed off on new legislative maps, stipulating that they would not come into effect until the November election.[11] The commission asked the state Supreme Court to clarify if the old or new district boundaries should be used in the recall effort.[12] On April 3, 2024, the court declined to clarify which maps should be used in a potential recall against Vos.[13]

Vos was elected to the state Assembly in 2004 and was re-elected in 2022 with 73% of the vote. He was elected as speaker of the state Assembly in 2013.

Recall supporters: First recall petition

Matthew Snorek filed the first recall petition on January 10, 2024. The recall petition listed the following reasons for recall:[14] “Vos is blocking fair elections in WI. Vos mislead the WI Assembly in the impeachment of Megan Wolfe. Vos said he will "try as hard as I can to make sure Donald Trump is not the nominee in 2024." Vos supported the unlawful drop boxes. Wisconsin must move "Forward" without Robin Vos in power.[15] ”Second recall petition Matthew Snorek filed the second recall petition on March 27, 2024. The recall petition listed the following reasons for recall:[16]“Robin Vos should be recalled for his tacit support of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), acceptance of money and trips from the CCP, failure to protect Wisconsin farmland from the CCP, lack of commitment to election integrity, blocking lower prescription drug costs, andflagrant disrespect for his own constituents by calling them "whack-jobs, morons, and idiots."[15]”

Recall opponents

"This recall is a waste of time, resources and effort. I’m proud of my record and the accomplishments that we’ve achieved this year. More tax reductions for Wisconsin families, increased local government funding, restrictions on DEI, historic investments in making housing more affordable and others too numerous to mention."

https://ballotpedia.org/Robin_Vos_recall,Wisconsin_State_Assembly(2024)

Kelly: Jack Smith And DOJ Used Classified Cover Sheets To Tamper With Documents Case Evidence. The FBI brought the cover sheets with them to set him up. That's not happened, the FBI doctored the photos

We now have proof that the FBI did this to create a crime, manufacturing evidence, etc. This is going to be bad for the Bidan, the DOJ, the FBI…. A misrepresentation of evidence by the DOJ and IC agencies.

Cannon is looking like she is being objective of both sides.

9:43

https://rumble.com/embed/v51ea8u/?pub=4

>>21088182

Julie says Fischer decision is coming out tomorrow from the Supreme Court at 10 am eastern time. This should be good.Pray for the 350-400 J6 defendants charged and locked for years under this false prosecution.

Dr. Arthur Herman, Historian: Primers for Understanding Institutions And Cultural Practices Needed To Sustain Freedom and understanding the CCP

39:25

https://rumble.com/embed/v51cwub/?pub=4

>>21088243

This is seriously interesting how he gives the history of all these foreign countries and how America was very backward in 1939 compared to them, and America had the energy and desire to excel beyond all of them

>>21088243

That was one of the best interviews he's had, this historian was amazing in a way I've never experienced. Dr. Arthur Herman gets it.