On one hand, Q knew the month (and near date) that JA would be released. Q also knew today (6/26/24) was the exact day the plea deal would be released showing that all unreleased documents would be removed from WikiLeaks (an apparent win for the deep state) and wrote that while “you may have the site (Wikileaks) we have the source”

So what does this mean? This is all a movie that the Q team is directing? or they (at the time in 2018) were responding to future events they somehow knew would happen on that exact date in 2024? Even after 7 years, both these options seem implausible to me (but I have no other explanation either)

>>21090862

I suppose its the “total control” aspect that I find implausible, everything we’re seeing is a scripted movie after the white hats took control in 2017. “You may have the site but we have the source” sort of implies removing documents from Wikileaks was out of WH control (but if it was out of their control how could they have known to talk about in 2018?). I also have a hard time with “total control” and Covid/vaccines. I understand the need to show people what was planned for them but 20M+ dead cannot be part of a scripted movie.

Partial control (silent war, moves and counter moves etc) seems the most plausible but I don’t see how it applies to the JA situation above. I can’t wait to find out

On another note, has anyone figured out how to read the map?