Amber Rose has gone FULL MAGA
0:20
(This should have a "trigger warning" on it for those who hate Trump, KEK)
https://rumble.com/embed/v51m1nl/?pub=4
Former CIA Chief reveals in great detail how they use full face masks to ‘walk around as someone else’…
June 26, 20241/2(Anons we’ve got to get a lot of screenshots tonight, to analyze what version Joe is)
While Biden doubles running around in a mask may sound like the plot of a Hollywood movie, can we truly dismiss anything in these strange times under this bizarre regime? Probably not. And it’s even more difficult to write it off as just another kooky conspiracy, especially when former CIA chiefs have disclosed how they use elaborate masks to allow people to “walk around as someone else.”
It’s not surprising that the CIA has a department called “Disguise” with an official chief who runs it. The former chief details below how the CIA operates, much like in a James Bond movie. Is it any wonder if they use these tactics with presidents and other key officials? It almost seems like a no-brainer, right?
Wall Street Apes:
Here’s The Uncut Version Of The CIA Chief Of Disguise Confirming They Use “Full Face Masks” To “Walk around as someone else”
This is why Joe Biden needs both a drug test and a DNA test before the CNN Debate with Donald Trump
“I was Chief of Disguise. The office I worked in was like the Q in James Bond. We were the Q for the CIA and the intelligence community. So, there were different parts of it, whatever you needed.
If you needed a bug, if you needed secret writing or a microdot or a concealment device or whatever you needed, you had to come to us and we’ll put something together for you.
Okay. “What’s the most memorable moment from being in disguise for you? Um, there were a number of them, but the one I mean, one that has to stand out, I went to the White House and I briefed George H. W. Bush, the president, at the time while I was wearing a full face mask.”
“So we’re sitting, like, this close together, and I’m telling him that I’m gonna show him the best disguise that we have. And he’s looking for a bag, like, where where is it? I said, well, I’m wearing it, and I’m going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got up and he walked and he looked and he looked at it.”
“He couldn’t, he didn’t know it was a mask. He wasn’t sure what I was wearing. He sat back down. He said, okay. So I took it off.
And I was holding it up in the air so he could see it, my whole head. It had hair and a face and a neck.
So, you could walk around as someone else? Absolutely. And that would be the disguise. Absolutely.”
https://revolver.news/2024/06/cia-chief-reveals-they-use-full-face-masks-to-walk-around-as-someone-else/
This is what the WH was calling Cheap Fakes, I bet.
2/2Granted, there are times when Joe seems like he’s sharper than usual. This leads many to think there are two types of “Joe.” One who is semi-energetic and can actually stand, walk, and talk. While the other “Joe” can’t string a sentence together and wanders off like a lost nursing home patient.
Could that be drugs, body doubles, or just good and bad days? Whatever the case may be, you can’t deny that many of the videos online paint a very bizarre picture.
Wall Street Apes:
Recently Images Of Joe Biden Have Been Going Viral, Many Questioning If He’s Being Impersonated Using The CIA Mask Technology
This Is Documentation Showing The Changes Seen In Joe Biden
Not only does he look completely different, have changing earlobes, changing chins, changing skin textures, changing teeth, changing wrinkle lines, etc
But after 30 years it looks as though he’s changed his signature“Who changes their signature after 30 years?”
President Trump is even questioning what’s going on with Joe and his “fake nose.” And what about that bizarre chin? It looks like it was molded with Play-Doh.
MJTruthUltra:
Let’s talk about this…
Trump is 2 I don’t give a fooks away from literally saying that Joe Biden is wearing a mask.
The world just saw the other day that Joes chin somehow transformed into a PlayStation controller and now this? 🤣😂
Oh we are definitely building up to something shocking…
Do you think the world is ready to learn “Joe’s Shot” and central casting?
Trump https://rumble.com/v3r904m-trump-joe-bidens-fake-nose-thered-be-plastic-all-over-the-floor.html
Biden https://rumble.com/v3q8gra-joe-biden-is-completely-shot-and-why-does-his-chin-look-like-a-pair-of-ball.html
This clip claims to catch a “body double” red-handed. Honestly, for security reasons, using decoys makes sense, especially for a world leader. But the stuff online about Joe seems just as crazy and off-the-wall as his entire regime.
Is the CIA using body doubles and face mask technology to pass off different “Joe Bidens” to the American people? Maybe, who knows? But if they are, they’re failing miserably. They should probably go back to the drawing board and figure out a better way to present this buffoon, because right now, it’s more like Joe or his double is impersonating a full-blown dementia patient. We’d like to think that even our intel people could do better than this.
(This why PDJT, answered this way: Trump was asked by MSM, “Do you underestimate Joe Bidan in the Debates?”, Trump said, “No I never underestimate him”)
https://revolver.news/2024/06/cia-chief-reveals-they-use-full-face-masks-to-walk-around-as-someone-else/
America First Legal Files SCOTUS Brief on Behalf of House Administration Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk Defending Stephen Bannon and Arguing that the January 6 Committee Was Invalid and Illegal
June 26, 2024
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) filed an amicus brief on behalf of Representative Barry Loudermilk (GA-11), Chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, in support of Stephen K. Bannon’s emergency stay application to the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Bannon’s stay application seeks his continued release pending further appeal of his convictions.
Rep. Loudermilk and his subcommittee are investigating the numerous security failures leading up to and on January 6, 2021, and reviewing the creation, operation, and results of the partisan Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (“Select Committee”).It is settled law that Congress must follow its own rules. Consequently, AFL and Rep. Loudermilk argue that theSelect Committee’s blatant noncompliance with House rules and resolutions means that it was unlawfully constitutedand that both itssubpoena to Mr. Bannon and the subsequent criminal referral that led to his convictions are invalid. Specifically:
• The Select Committee was illegal from the start. H. Res. 503, § 2(a), creating the Select Committee, provided that “the Speaker shall appoint thirteen Members, five of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.” However, the Select Committee had only nine members because then-Speaker Pelosi ignored this provision to silence dissent.
• The Select Committee ignored deposition rules. H. Res. 503 § 5(6)(B) specifically stated that the Select Committee’s deposition authority was “governed by the procedures submitted by the chair of the Committee on Rules for printing in the Congressional Record.” The House Committee on Rules’ Regulations for the Use of Deposition Authority required the Select Committee’s chairman to consult with the ranking minority member prior to conducting a deposition. This rule was also ignored.
• The Select Committee lacked a ranking minority member and therefore could not conduct lawful investigations. The Select Committee ignored House rules requiring a ranking minority member. Instead, several months after it was created and more than a month following its first hearing, Representative Liz Cheney was named “Vice Chair.” A “vice chair” is distinct and different from a ranking minority member under House Rules, conference and caucus rules, and precedent. Without a ranking member, the Select Committee could not conduct lawful investigations.
•The Select Committee failed to follow the rules when it referred Mr. Bannon for contempt. The Select Committee claimed that Mr. Bannon improperly and illegally refused to appear for a deposition. However, because the Select Committee chose not to have a ranking member, it could not lawfully conduct Mr. Bannon’s deposition.
Accordingly, AFL and Rep. Loudermilk have asked the Supreme Court to grant Mr. Bannon’s application.
Statement from Representative Barry Loudermilk (GA-11):
“Over the past year and a half, my Subcommittee has uncovered concerningmisconduct by the Democrats’ former January 6 Select Committee. They suppressed evidence, deleted key files, and intentionally misled Congress and the American people all in an effort to protect a preconceived narrative.
The Select Committee failed to comply with the rules governing its own procedures.Therefore, the prosecution of Mr. Bannon for failing to appear for a deposition is invalid, as is any criminal prosecution.
My amicus brief will hold the Select Committee accountable and nullify their deeply flawed work conducted outside the bounds of legitimacy.” said Rep. Loudermilk.
Statement from Dan Epstein, America First Legal Vice President:
“The January 6 Select Committee’s violations of House Rules and Regulations invalidates their formal actions against individuals. Thus the indictment of Bannon lacks a legal foundation.The Supreme Court should take note of Chairman Loudermilk’s arguments to grant the emergency stay Bannon has requested,” said Dan Epstein.
brief attached
https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-files-scotus-brief-on-behalf-of-house-administration-oversight-subcommittee-chairman-rep-barry-loudermilk-defending-stephen-bannon-and-arguing-that-the-january-6-committee-was-inv/
I can't wait until all of the Dems and Fake Reps are interrogated along with their staff, many wanted to point out the security failures, but Pelosi and Cheney were only doing it to smear Trump and make him responsible for everything that occurred on J6, also the FBI and other agencies need to be interrogated and tried for colluding with a Coup on President Trump. There must be Legal Justice against all who planned the Coup, from Agencies, to Military, and all the others NGO's that participated, including the stupid Ukrainian Nazis that came and created havoc. All of them must be found and charged.
The Committee spent $20-$30 million for this farce, Pelosi should be the first to be arrested.
The funny thing is these assholes were so confident they could get away with it, they have talked about it on the news, in print, and every other way to expose themselves. This was not just people in America, there was WW support for this because the leaders hate Trump, especially in Europe, those people need to be scooped up by Interpol also, and Zelensky and his gang of Mafia Oligarchs. Obama and Joe Bidan were in on it along with a lot of Obama staff and agency heads from his administrations
Murthy v. Missouri: SCOTUS Decision Analysis
by: Tracy Beanz 06/26/2024
(Long but good article, only posting a few paragraphs)
I want to make sure this is clear from the get-go—this is a terrible opinion. I am not happy about it. HOWEVER, this opinion had to do with the TEMPORARY INJUNCTION in this case. For details, please see my pinned tweet on X. The court is making a decision whether, at this stage of the game, after limited (will get to that in a moment) discovery, the Plaintiffs have the right to an injunction that would halt the government from coercing and cooperating with social media platforms to censor speech.
The Justices used whether the plaintiffs had STANDING at this stage of the game as their basis for decision. Which I ALSO think is utter nonsense. When this case went before them, they placed a stay on the injunction that was decided in the lower district court AND the 5th circuit court of appeals.
We can get into the future later on in the thread—but to note: when the stay was placed on the temporary injunction, three Justices DISSENTED stating their colleagues hadn’t read the record. I believe that still to be the case. I believe the Justices made this decision based on the oral argument. The oral argument was POOR.
Here is some of the meat from the syllabus: “Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have established Article III Standing to seek an injunction against any defendant.” The SCOTUS is saying at this stage, the plaintiffs must show the substantial risk that in the near future, at least one platform will restrict the speech of at least one plaintiff in response to the actions of at least one government defendant. “Here, at the preliminary injunction stage, they must show that they are likely to succeed in carrying that burden. On the record, in this case, that is a tall order”
I disagree. The record is FULL of instances that demonstrate the potential for future harm, and also for past harm. I don’t believe the Justices read the record. Had they, there just isn’t a way to come to this decision. This is why the oral argument was so important. Three of the Justices WARNED that the oral argument would be important.
The more I read, the worse it gets. This is the same sort of obscure nonsense that allows the government to get away with the large majority of censorship they have done so far, however even in discovery SO FAR, they have concrete coercion. SCOTUS believes that Plaintiff Jill Hines has the best chance at proving harm, but they also say that self-censorship can’t be weighed here—standing can’t be obtained by “manufacturing harm” against themselves that doesn’t equate to a real injury. And again, the SCOTUS punts “without evidence of continued pressure by defendants, the platforms remain free to enforce, or not to enforce their policies against COVID-19 misinformation…” This, even as the record shows that platforms CRAFTED THEIR POLICY based on government intervention… Bad. Bad. Bad.
On the “right to listen,” the court says the Plaintiffs haven’t identified a particular speaker they have not been able to hear from. This is one reason why a class certification would have gone a long way in this case. One was sought at lower and denied.
Here, SCOTUS is outlining each department and the actions they took. If what I highlighted isn’t coercion, we have different definitions. This is almost embarrassing. The SCOTUS leans heavily on what the platforms did on their own but does not take into account the record in the case.
The SCOTUS will not address whether coercion happened. They punt. On standing issues. Read carefully “At this stage, neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have established standing to seek an injunction against any defendant. We, therefore, lack jurisdiction to reach the merits of the dispute.” Basically, more discovery is needed, as per SCOTUS, and as I am reading ahead, I can say with certainty that this case will end up in front of SCOTUS once again.
Here, the SCOTUS almost tells the Plaintiffs they should have been suing for their past harms rather than the harms they will experience in the future. Because they are looking for relief from FUTURE harm, the past injury can only be used in a predictive nature…
Tomi Lahren and Tucker Carlson suffered DIRECT harm from censorship via government coercion. The government said to social media platforms, “Remove this,” and the platforms DID. They aren’t plaintiffs…SCOTUS keeps saying discovery was extensive. It was not…..
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2024/06/26/murthy-v-missouri-scotus-decision-analysis
she is a hideous creature released from hell to campaign that all of us go to hell. May she get her terrible karma back.
EVEN CATHIE WOOD KNOWS WHAT TIME IT IS!!!😎🥳🥳🥳
0:29
Who is Kathie Wood?
Kathie Wood is an American investor, founder, CEO, and CIO of Ark Invest, an investment management firm that focuses on disruptive innovation. She is a renowned stock-picker and has built a reputation for her innovative approach to investing.
Early Life and Education
Born in 1955 in Los Angeles, California, Kathie Wood graduated summa cum laude from the University of Southern California with a Bachelor of Science degree in finance and economics in 1981. One of her professors, economist Arthur Laffer, became her mentor.
Career
After working at AllianceBernstein, Wood left the company in 2014 to found ARK Invest, which she named after the Ark of the Covenant. The company’s first four ETFs were seeded with capital from Bill Hwang of Archegos Capital. Wood’s flagship ARK Innovation exchange-traded fund (ETF) has received accolades for its performance in 2017, 2020, and 2023, but is also considered by Morningstar to be the third highest “wealth destroyer” investment fund from 2014-2023.
Investment Style and Philosophy
Kathie Wood is a proponent of actively managed ETFs based on disruptive innovation. She believes that technology can and will change the world, and investing on the right side of that change is the best strategy. Her investment style is characterized by a focus on innovation, risk-taking, and a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom.
Personal Life
Wood is a devout Christian and has been involved in various philanthropic efforts, including donating funds to her high school to start the Duddy Innovation Institute, which encourages girls to study disruptive innovation. She is also a strong advocate for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, with an allocation of 25% of her net worth in bitcoin as of 2024.
Notable Achievements
• Founder, CEO, and CIO of Ark Invest
• Pioneer in actively managed ETFs based on disruptive innovation
• Flagship ARK Innovation ETF has received accolades for its performance in 2017, 2020, and 2023
• Strong advocate for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies
• Philanthropic efforts, including the Duddy Innovation Institute
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
https://rumble.com/embed/v510ccb/?pub=4
BOOOOOOOM!!! THE STREETS HAVE SPOKEN!!!😎🇺🇸🥳🥳🥳
This is very uplifting, and exciting. I hope PDJT gets a 100 million votes…because they will be real votes.
2:02
https://rumble.com/embed/v51fl31/?pub=4