>>21095036
No, your muhjoo narrative is muhjoo.
Q never muhjooed, you're projecting your own muhjoo onto Q, to smear and slander Q as nazi/fascist/antisemitic.
Does Rothschild actions make 17 million people guilty?
Why are you trying so hard to conflate INDIVIDUAL criticism with GROUP criticism?
Why is that so very important to your agenda?
Are you not able or not willing to criticize individuals and focus on their actions, where justice served is for individuals who committed those actions?
Or are you trying to PROTECT AND DEFEND those individuals, by trying to form a 17 million human shield defense around those individuals where the narrative is that the criticisms of those individuals is somehow motivated by anti-GROUP bigotry, THE VERY SAME group bigotry you're projecting, and does not motivate Q, The Plan, true anons, MAGA, or the Great Awakening, but in fact just yourself and your demonic masters pushing the protection narrative?
You're clinging to muhjoo to defend the satanic cult. That's what you're doing here, it's why you chose a variant of a Christian name, so as to portray muhjoo as being sourced from Christianity, another projection, and why you reject basic logic, and commit logical fallacy after logical fallacy, including fallacy of composition?
Your entire muhjoo narrative is a defense of the cult. Period.
Anons know which side you're on.