Chevron has been overturned. Good. Justice Kagan disagrees and said the following. She sells out the court in favor of the deep state.

"Chevron, she says, rests on the idea that "Congress knows that it does notin fact cannotwrite perfectly complete regulatory statutes. It knows that those statutes will inevitably contain ambiguities that some other actor will have to resolve, and gaps that some other actor will have to fill. And it would usually prefer that actor to be the responsible agency, not a court."

Here's the link to the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf

Scotusblog.com

https://

The J6 case

The court holds that to prove a violation of the law, the government must show that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding, or attempted to do so.www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf

The court reverses the D.C. Circuit, which had adopted a broader reading of the law to allow the charges against Fischer to go forward. The case now goes back to the D.C. Circuit – which, the court says, can assess whether the indictment can still stand in light of this new and narrower interpretation.

>>21103749

Scotusblog.com

The J6 case

"Justice Jackson, who joined the majority opinion, also has a concurring opinion. She stresses that despite "the shocking circumstances involved in this case," the "Court's task is to determine what conduct is proscribed by the criminal statute that has been invoked as the basis for the obstruction charge at issue here."

Here's the link to the J6 opinion:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf