Anonymous ID: f7190c June 28, 2024, 2:05 p.m. No.21106165   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21106155

Super secret:

These have been happening for many decades, kept hidden by fake news, it's only now for the first time it's in the open for the public to see.

WINNING

Anonymous ID: f7190c June 28, 2024, 2:18 p.m. No.21106246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6404 >>6502

Chevron deference is OVER!!!

 

Technological advancement is, God willing, going to massively accelerate after SCOTUS ruled that courts are no longer forced to defer to the interpretations of law by unelected bureaucrats, and regulators can't just make up laws anymore, which means the entrepreneurial adaption and drive will again permit small startups to flourish as they once did.

 

==If a regulator can't point to the law that gives them the power, they may not have the power. And you might be able to win in a court of law.

If the regulator isn't specifically authorized by statute, they can't invent some regulation to stop your innovation.==

 

https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1806773841395675218

Anonymous ID: f7190c June 28, 2024, 2:48 p.m. No.21106441   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Methodological Individualism

 

The epistemology that scares the "must…repeat…group bigotry" division shills serving the cult that feeds, lives off and depend on social division.

 

The smallest minority is the individual.

Everyone is an individual, so this approach includes precisely everyone and excludes precisely noone.

 

https://mises.org/mises-daily/principle-methodological-individualism

Anonymous ID: f7190c June 28, 2024, 3:07 p.m. No.21106547   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6616

>>21106494

>we've already lost

yes, (you) have.

Anons have already won.

just watching the remaining chess moves play out.

Durham hasn't announced his investigation is closed. Ghosted.

Anonymous ID: f7190c June 28, 2024, 3:23 p.m. No.21106620   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6624 >>6634 >>6715

It isn't "the jews", but AIPAC is involved.

Why does every member of Congress (except Massie, whose wife recently died) have an AIPAC "handler"?

Is that not foreign interference in a sovereign nation?

Anonymous ID: f7190c June 28, 2024, 3:44 p.m. No.21106724   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6734

>>21106700

No, false, anon applies this UNIVERSALLY.

But anon is not responsible for the fact that the quantity of group bigotry is itself targeted to some groups more than others, and so choosing to attack the largest threats more often than the smaller threats.

It's like an army, some battalions are tasked to target one enemy in one location, but that doesn't mean that battalion is somehow ok with every other enemy.

It's picking the right battles at the right time.

If tomorrow the shilling pattern switched, and we started to see endless anti-white or anti-asian or anti-Christian or anti-something else, FOR YEARS ON END, EVERY DAY, in the same quantity, then you can bet your ass more of anons like me will adapt.