The question is, why would they fudge his birth certificate? If his mom was a US citizen at the time of his birth, it wouldn't matter WHERE he was born, he could still be a US citizen. He could have been born on an iceberg and if his mom was a US citizen at the time of his birth, that would make him a US citizen as well.
This whole idea of WHERE a person is born, has got to go out the window.
>borders include citizenship
That's how we got stuck with all of these anchor babies that actually should not be considered citizens.
IMO, it is going to take the SCOTUS to sort out that mess.
They want you to fear them.
They use all kinds of evil tactics to keep people in fear of them.
It's a Control thing.
Consider the ADL. If you say anything bad about Jewish people, the Jewish people will ruin you. They literally prove that what you have said about them is true.
Kill or be killed is the only choice they have.
Should the slaves who were used to perform as Gladiators in the Colosseum have been charged with murder?
No.
0bama actually is a US citizen if his mother was a US citizen at the time of his birth. 0bama is not an anchor baby.
Remember Q said that he will claim Kenyan citizenship to try to escape. But it won't work, because he actually is a US citizen.
Kamala, on the other hand, is an anchor baby.
Neither of her parents were a US citizen at the time of her birth.
They try to muddy the water on citizenship.
True.
Could get interdasting.
She never should have been made VP in the first place, but timing is everything.
Maybe it's all part of The Plan.
They have been led here under false pretenses and promises of "free stuff?"
That's why I said they have a choice to kill or be killed.
Jesus chose to sacrifice Himself, for reasons.
The Gladiators were pitted against each other for the amusement of the audience.
If one of the Gladiators had refused to fight back or try to defend himself, it would not have been as amusing for the depraved spectators.
The Romans were bored with the Christians who were put into the ring because they wouldn't fight back.
Follow the thread.
It's about if people who were victims of SRA, and were forced to kill another person, or be killed themselves, are guilty of murder.
My take is that they are not guilty of murder because they were forced to do it under duress of being killed if they didn't. So yes, I would agree that it is Self Defense. Maybe not self defense from the person that they killed, but if they didn't kill that person, their handler would have them killed. So kill or be killed.
>>21110821 meant for