>>21110034 pb

>How so? You posted two definitions that cancel each other out.

LOGIC FUCKING 101

if the statement "if p then q" is true

the contrapositive MUST also be true

"if p then q" IMPLIES "if not q then not p"

ERGO

"IF something is worth doing, THEN it is not easy"

is the logical equivalent of

"IF something is easy, THEN it is not worth doing"

you should follow the korean robot's example

and KYS, shill bot/tard

>>21110850

>What is worse than in rebellion against God?

God is NOT what you think

if you knew, you might be in rebellion as well

>>21110854

>Do you think the practice of crucifixion was an abusive Satanic ritual?

just business

>>21110878

>So we've been deceived into rebelling against God

no, you've been deceived into WORSHIPPING God

>>21110873

that's BIG BROTHER logic