Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 6:35 a.m. No.21114839   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4844

>>21114721

>Are numberfags the real shills by getting the nowfags all worked up or just lowest ranked autists bored af while waiting for the BOOM (x4)?

Gotta admit, that is a fair question.

Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 6:43 a.m. No.21114870   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21114792

>removing the power of the bureaucratic agencies

In theory and moar down the line for sure.

Short term tho the agencies can still fafo per usual, but the lawsuits will now start to pile up and bite them in the ass eventually.

Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 7:08 a.m. No.21115004   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21114979

Well, it is the heart of swamp ass season.

Ok, sold, next time I'll overpay and make that impulse decision instead of being offended by product placement blatantly imagining the smell of my crotch.

Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 7:18 a.m. No.21115061   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5074

>>21115047

That's gonna be tough for anons that aren't here frequently enough to know which ones are shills.

Maybe BO can check with Jim Watson to see if there's some kind of color coding to put on the id or something to identify it as a shill post?

That would be helpful.

Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 7:43 a.m. No.21115173   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21115157

Yeah, that decision is great news.

It's the managing expectations part.

Nothing will change overnight.

It's gonna be the future lawsuits down the line that define what things will look like moving forward, and that takes time.

Provided Congress leaves the laws regarding status quo as they are wont to do in recent decades.

Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 7:55 a.m. No.21115245   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5281

>>21115226

Well, it would have been done already if Q was in charge.

But, he isn't.

It's Q+ that calls the shots and he wanted to do that whole underdog rallying after being knocked down thingy.

That wrestlingfag shit he did with that McMahon guy is to blame imo.

Anonymous ID: a26cbc June 30, 2024, 8:07 a.m. No.21115288   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21115271

>Who is this ‘you’

Fresh off the success of banning the use of "we" on QR it appears "you" is next.

Can anyone stop them (ha ha "them" hasn't been banned yet!)?