Because he knows that trump isn't going to give him 60 billion a year to keep it going.
the call them 'stakeholders'
at least they admit that the party is an owned entity.
how honest of them to admit it is a private club.
you are really devoted to him, aren't you anon.
he makes you weep with joy.
you love him so much.
too bad he didn't have that kind of devotion to president Trump when it mattered.
If this were true and I wrote it I wouldn't say 'Israel' as the subject of some of the sentences. I'd say 'Criminals within the Israeli power structure'
criminals if they really did it.
Israel didn't do it to itself.
criminals did it.
if the criminals were Israelis that's just them not all of Israel.
how much more are they going to grift?
they've been looting for over 40 years.
don't they have enough already?
>(You)
when he smiles at you do you swoon?
does he make your heart skip a beat?
when he sees you in a crowded room is it like it's just you and him?
Devotion like that is a good thing.
but to think that hes' gonna be the VP candidate after all that went down . . .
anon, come on.
we'll see, won't we.
don't stop loving him anon.
it's cool that you do.
everyone else? many others are skeptical and think he betrayed our President on Jan 6, 2021, so you can't expect us, not being in love with Pence, to feel like you do.
Isn't it possible that RFK is correct about marshlands needing protection and that the Chevron rule was also correct to overturn?
he took his stance because he wants to protect wetlands, which is very important or they get filled and built upon.
so he supported the rules because he wanted to get it done.
so now that the rules need to be reviewed, he can be an advocate to say 'these rules that they made, even though they did it in a draconian way and it was unconstitutional, are still good rules. Congress, make it so.'
that's good, right, a citizen who knows the situation in the marshes to be an advocate for protecting them?
a woodland swamp or vernal pond is quite different than a marsh.
different plants, different wildlife.
marshes typically have marsh grasses and tall reeds.
a swamp might be deep in a forest, at a rill in the land ,and it would have hardwood trees and all kinds of other stuff that is rather noxious.
and I think in New England if it's salt water it's called a marsh. But if it's fresh water, it could be either.
if it's in DC the swamp is the deep state!
people who agree with the rules need to now make a case for the ones that work.
and people who disagree with the rules need to now make a case for rescinding the ones that don't work.
a blanket rescinding of all the rules made with the outragious method of the Chevron rule would probably cause havoc.
Congress should lead, and states too.
and the people who profiteered off the old system
might do the best if they stayed out of it.
this is a time when government needs to work.
the situation has to be different, and let these high paid people work for their incomes now.
not over thinking, describing the actual situation in New England.
all the regulations can't be tossed onto the burn pile without a lot of havoc.
government needs to step up and do their job now.
the criminals who did that need to be held to account.
Israel should start arresting the Jews involved with this, if any of it is true.
how? the job for life people are still going to be there.
they'll still get all their pay.
they might not beable to get as many kick backs.
they won't have a golden parachutte into private industry.
they won't be able to help their frens who they would favor as easily.
but they are pretty cushy in their cat bird seat.
they'll be hard to up root and even harder to fire.
unenumerated powers do not exist.
the regulations need to be reviewed and the ones that make sense can be voted on by congress. the ones that were just for the profiteering of skunks in SES and their frens should be thrown on the burn pile.
how it will work? I guess that this is when government has to govern and legislators have to legislate.
d8bca3 seemed to say that. That's why I posted, because d8bca3 is wrong about that.
for some reason I can see . . .
Adam Kinzinger
in Hamlet playing
. . . Ophelia (he had to do it in drag, of course)
ya, no, Adam couldn't pull off Ophelia.
she's too well loved a character.
the country is about to be thrust into a litigious regulatory crisis because the Chevron Rule is unconstitutional and the Democrats are doing a Lady McBeth thing in DC and ignoring the havoc that is about to ensue.
don't be surprised if dozens and dozens of lawsuits blizzard the courts tomorrow, already having been prepared in anticipation of the Chevron Rule being thrown on the burn pile.
and from the people actually in charge in DC? Crickets.
the Democrats still aren't going to win the election no matter what they plot in Europe.
or the system could do what it's done since WWII: give everything and all the money to the frens of the Cabal.
wait, that didn't work and now we are in an almost WWIII situation.
is that kid's name John John?
nice theory.
go to Alamogordo with a Geiger counter and go stand at the ground zero spot and read what it says.