Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 12:29 p.m. No.21121908   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1929

>>21121879

>the bias shitheads running our government they cannot prosecute Trump for NOT committing any actual crime.

 

Isn't the point of litigation to determine if a person committed a crime? They couldn't bring charges against Trump cause he is immune now, even though they may suspect him of doing a crime and even possibly have evidence? Is that right?

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 12:34 p.m. No.21121944   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21121903

>The Plan:

 

>Forced cognizance upon an unknowing and unwilling populace by back door manipulation of mass media.

 

You say it really well.

Deprogram the populace using media sources and propaganda. And to program the populace to love and adore Trump.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 12:37 p.m. No.21121959   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1975 >>1983

>>21121929

>or outside his Constitutional authority.

This is the problem though. They can claim they were in their constitutional authority. Then what? They are immune. They should not be immune. They should fall under the same legal jurisdiction as everyone else. If they don't want to then they shouldn't run for Prez.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 12:39 p.m. No.21121969   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1978

>>21121931

>a former President to '''absolute immunity

 

>from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclu-

 

>sive constitutional authority.''' And he is entitled to at least presump-

 

>tive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts.

 

This is a bad ruling. They will be able to claim they were in their constitutional authority.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 12:48 p.m. No.21122033   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2195 >>2565

Real talk. We know that Q and the MI are behind the Supreme court immunity ruling today. Is it ok that Q and MI intelligence are pulling strings behind the scenes without our permission? I don't think it is ok. No matter how you spin it, I did not consent.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 1:04 p.m. No.21122141   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2167

>>21122104

>Anarchy would follow.

I'm actually fine with Anarchy. We find ourselves in this current situation BECAUSE of the institutions, the public officials, and the laws. Criminals will game any system and a system as obtuse as the legal system is impossible for the average person to fight against. The legal system is part of the problem.

 

The rule of law and the Constitution HAS been in place and HAS done nothing to protect our rights. If anything it has confined us in a criminals world.

 

We need to reduce laws to make things better. We need to follow a simple system that respects free will instead of a legal system. This system would simply ask, WAS FREE WILL violated.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 1:18 p.m. No.21122236   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2265

>>21122167

>areas/communities where some are allowed and others are not.

States already exist. Maybe it would be easier if we lived with like minded people instead of this cart blanche system of All for One, One for All.

 

Surely Anarchy isn't the correct course of action but honoring human rights and honoring free will is. The legal system could easily be replaced with a Humanity first Free will system. Simply. Did your actions violate free will? Yes = guilty. No = Innocent

For example, Is speeding a violation of free will? No.

Is not paying taxes a violation of free will? No.

Is raping? Murdering? Killing? Extortion? Bombing people? Yes.

 

It's actually easy to replace the legal system with a better system.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 1:25 p.m. No.21122275   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2305

>>21122265

>True,

True, You would need some sort of system still for violent crimes. Remove the rest of the legal system fat and streamline the processes and boom. New better system. I think part of the implementation is education. Educating people on what free will is and how to respect it would be a priority. Additionally a focus on human rights would be necessary. We can send them to re-education camps.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 1:49 p.m. No.21122405   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2438

>>21122389

>That includes stopping witch hunts against political rivals.

Politics should be abolished too. Politics are an illusion perpetrated by corrupt individuals. Politics seeks to divide and what we should be doing is unifying. The whole administrative government needs to be reigned in along with federal and state power. A simpler system needs to be implemented to reduce all the noise and confusion. The Amish do fine without all of this nonsense. We the People would do fine too. Clearly the Q plan is to move in that direction but it needs to reprogram everyone first.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 1:51 p.m. No.21122410   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2438

>>21122404

>how to fund basic infrastructure.

Tax corporations, imports, new good purchases (per GESARA). Donations as well. People like to donate so have them donate for roads. Additionally, the government literally prints money so print money to make roads.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 1:57 p.m. No.21122454   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2490

>>21122438

>I think we need to abolish the income tax and private property tax. Use the sales tax to help fund infrastructure and as far as schooling, allow everyone to homeschool or network local homeschooling programs with one another.

 

This is all fine.

Anonymous ID: 0e2b90 July 1, 2024, 2:14 p.m. No.21122539   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21122490

>The political division

Political division is created by them. There is no need for parties at all except to create division. I don't agree with voting and giving away your power to corrupt presidents but if you were going to vote then you should vote for the person and what the person stands for. Not a party.