>The Brunson case.
In that suit (Brunson vs Adams), Mr. Raland Brunson challenged the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. The district court dismissed the suit, we affirmed, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. Mr. Brunson brought a second suit, which we now address. In the second suit, Mr. Brunson sued three Associate Justices of the Supreme Court (Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson) in their official capacities for denying certiorari in the prior case. The second suit began in state court, and the three Justices removed the action to federal district court. The district court ordered dismissal, concluding that the Justices enjoyed sovereign immunity. We affirm. When an action is removed from state court, the federal court considers whether the state court had jurisdiction. If jurisdiction existed in state court, the federal court generally acquires jurisdiction if removal is otherwise appropriate. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. Co., 258 U.S. 377, 382 (1922). We call this jurisdiction “derivative” because the federal court’s jurisdiction derives from the state court’s.
(Check this page out)
https://thefruitedplain.substack.com/p/brunson-vs-sotomayor-et-al