IT WAS NOT HIS OFFICIAL DUTIES, THAT IS HOW, IT WAS ONLY DONE TO START THE PATRIOT ACT TO SPY ON AMERICAN CITIZENS AND ARREST A LOT MORE OF US
Justice Clarence Thomas Issues Warning to Jack Smith in Trump Immunity Ruling, with Charlie Kirk. Justice Thomas has said to Jack Smith, not so subtilty, I can shut you downI knew this was a warning in his opinion about Jack Smith, he knows what Smith is doing, Smith is not even allowed to go after Trump. Great Video!
7:04
https://youtu.be/2QdNQmIazQM?si=uTUlKlbbAa4A_nSB
Barr is pretty arrogant.
Bill Barr laughs about Steve Bannon going to prison.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1807954474410835996
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
Chief Justice to Kagan, KBJ, and Sotomayor:
"Despite the unprecedented nature of this case, the significant constitutional questions that it raises, its expedited treatment in the lower courts and in this Court, the lack of factual analysis in the lower courts, and the lack of briefing on how to categorize the conduct alleged, the principal dissent would go ahead and declare all of it unofficial.
The other dissent, meanwhile, analyzes the case under comprehensive models and paradigms of its own concoction and accuses the Court of providing 'no meaningful guidance about how to apply [the] new paradigm or how to categorize a President’s conduct.' It would have us exhaustively define every application of Presidential immunity. Our dissenting colleagues exude an impressive infallibility. While their confidence may be inspiring, the Court adheres to time-tested practices instead—deciding what is required to dispose of this case and remanding after 'revers[ing] on a threshold question.'"
I get the impression the Liberals have been warned:
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1807801909375328279
In other words, they weren't taking into consideration the "significant constitutional questions it raises", that the SC have never been given the chance to rule on; they chose to go ideological and make a dissent ruling that totally eliminates their ability to be Supreme Court Judges.
This was not about "Trump" it was about a Presidential case that has never come to the SC, and they chose to be arrogant.
He's saying imo, that all of them should have concluded that the President had immunity, but they were only looking at the subject at the moment, whom they hate.
How would they rule if this was Obama?
There is going to be some retraining on what their duties are as a SC Judge.
Good listen!
https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1807793624278597949