dChan
Anonymous ID: 1ed2a6 Jan. 30, 2018, 7:38 a.m. No.211394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1407 >>1420

>>211278

>#ObamaGate

 

This is an incredibly bad idea. It will only galvanize Dems and lefties to rally around their man. It's obviously partisan, and will hurt rather than help POTUS and our country.

I am not going to use it.

Anonymous ID: 1ed2a6 Jan. 30, 2018, 7:50 a.m. No.211470   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1486

>>211421

And Q also said that wouldn't happen, in the beginning when he first started posting

 

10/29/17

>>147166292

http:// archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147146601/#q147166292

>POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure optical reasons. To suggest this is the plan is false__ and should be common sense.__

Anonymous ID: 1ed2a6 Jan. 30, 2018, 8:15 a.m. No.211603   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1625 >>1635 >>1652

>>211543

>>211548

 

The other hashtags are good because they aren't nakedly partisan. It would be incredibly stupid and counter-productive to make a big push with a very obvious partisan hashtag.

 

OUR JOB IS TO HELP POTUS

Is is helpful if we push people away - the very people he really needs to win over? (not talking about the unreachable 4-6%)

 

In order to be successful with the task POTUS chose us for, we need to do what WORKS and stop doing what doesn't. Not sure how much more I can dumb it down for you.

 

>>211564

> debate tactics

> mind control techniques

Way to miss the point.

Advertising works because it uses certain principles - they do what WORKS. We have s hort amount of time to do this and be successful. We can waste time by making insulting memes that only rile up our opponents, cause them to circle the wagons, dig in and ignore reality.

OR

We can do what fucking works, make memes that guide them to a different POV, that uses marketing and psychological principles to get them to get behind POTUS' programs and actions.

Anonymous ID: 1ed2a6 Jan. 30, 2018, 8:20 a.m. No.211633   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1674

>>211625

Sure buddy, go ahead and do the exact opposite of what has tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to hammer into anons' heads.

>It's not R vs D

Keep us posted on your results.

Anonymous ID: 1ed2a6 Jan. 30, 2018, 8:32 a.m. No.211694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1710

>>211641

Yes, good job

 

>>211652

There are people making memes using sound principles, there are others slapping words on text with no composition, unaesthetic, and no one will use them, there are others busy making partisan memes that will make POTUS' and Q's jobs harder. There are people making memes that will actually help POTUS.

>Do what works

>Do what doesn't

Each anon's choice.

I've made a lot of memes that will actually help POTUS, so I am in fact, doing. Others are also.

 

I am not going to use the #Obamagate hashtag because it is very counter-productive. Others are free to use it and harm POTUS and make his job more difficult.

Anonymous ID: 1ed2a6 Jan. 30, 2018, 8:38 a.m. No.211728   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1743

>>211710

Have wondered that, too as it makes the graphic obsolete when the hastag is no longer being used, necessitating editing of the graphic or making a new one.

 

So which way is better? Hashtag on the graphic or no?