>>211504

> studying psychological warfare for 30 years

then you should have realized that an

appeal to authority type arguement doesn't work very well here

debate tactics

mind control techniques

seen 'em

meh

>>211603

>certain principles

>We can do what fucking works,

you mean like mr. edward bernays work?

you missed my point

appearl to authority

with 30 years experience under my belt you should listen to MY opinion…

>blah blah blah

persuasion is a fine art that isn't the same as advertising

>>211666 (cheKEKed satanic trips)

I got your point entirely anon,

>you don't sell the product by pissing on the customer

I'll let you in on a little secret anon, we are not selling a product here,

there are some who can be persuaded by facts and there are others who need to be jolted out of their rut, and some that will never convert

>4%~6% lost

>>211785

>Then Grabbed At The FBI Agents Weapon While Bound

>>211922 (cheKeKed)

it's compression artifacts from the points on the stars not quite exactly lining up with the compression grid

>jpg is a compressed format

>>211955 (cheKeKed)

true if big

>>211979

I'll bet it's leaked dregs from the recently dissolved presidential commission

>>212009

hmmm… the NSA might have comms between operative during the planning stage so that an estimate of voter fraud could be made.

to the best of my knowledge no actual voting data travels via electronic comms prior to counting

so I"m not quite sure what part the NSA could have in detecting fraudulent vote counts

>>212085

>Dilley's NSA reference wasn't directly to counting votes, but preceded the drop of the intel he gave.

>>211955

>actual Popular Vote count (rounded because I couldn't keep up with the numbers fast enough) was Trump with 70 Million votes, Clinton with 53 Million.

so… what does the NSA have to do with anything? sounds like misdirection to hide where he actually got the data from