BAKER missing Q post from May 18th
good work anon. seriously. but how about we not educate the shills on how to better shill
Did you read what you linked to? A judge must interpret law and statute as written. no homo
Can (you) point me to the part of the Constitution that addresses marriage?
agreed anon. BAD doubles for both. What point do you think Trump is trying to make?
that's just wrong LOL Lil' dude can't even breathe through that stuffy nose
Circular logic, anon. I pointed out that a SC judge can only uphold current laws and statutes. Those currently support more than 'marriage is between a man and a woman'. As with health care, the SC upheld the right of the government to impose a tax – as stated in statutes or laws. (not a lawfag, not a shill)
Trump was able to grab the middle to win, just like Obama did. Let that sink in.
Didn't Schumer just say that today about blocking Kavanaugh's nomination?
My bad. Schumer said "with everything I have"
I'm sure it's been sauced already and isn't a notable.
confirmation sauce?
I cannot even imagine living in a country where the rules are made by people I can't vote for.
It's insanity.
I believe you used 'suspect' instead of suspicious.
"Given the right amount of motivation, people are capable of anything," a quote from the bodyl anguage interpreter when describing JJ.
"He's got suspicions," body language experts opinion as JJ talks about his nephews 'accident'.