Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 5:21 p.m. No.21134623   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21134613

why do you ask me senseless questions?

you do.

unless you are Q don't tell the board where Q is going to be posting, OK?

we've all been down this road before and it's always a dead end into a conflict-localle.

don't message back to me I will not respond to you.

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 5:43 p.m. No.21134759   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4786 >>4817

>>21134739

even if internal combustion engines are outlawed the need for drilling and for oil will continue.

for example a wind turbine uses a large amount of oil keep the gears from over heating. The idea that they are illiminating the use of what they call 'fossil fuels' is a great big lie.

They just won't use it for fuel, but it will be there in the machines and could leak out and cause a mess at any time.

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 5:47 p.m. No.21134805   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4875

>>21134786

if there were technologies that allowed for the easy use of what you call 'free energy' there would be piggish people who would use so much of it thta it would create a significant spike in heat throughout the globe.

the release of technology to tap it would create a huge need for regulation on the use of that tech or the pigs will burn the world to a cinder.

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 6 p.m. No.21134892   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4971

>>21134875

if only people could be trusted, anon.

but they can't.

we know that some people are all about themself and don't care about the messes they create, the inequality, the descrimination that they practice.

the same ones who make the world odious now would be the type who would use the free energy to do things that would harm everyone else.

it's just the nature of that kind of person.

 

regulations on the use of that energy will be necessary or the same class of folks who, for example, only built on wetlands, or who didn't care how much they polluted, or dumped toxins in the soil where children play, will do the same kinds of things.

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 6:08 p.m. No.21134953   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4969 >>5037

>>21134927

she's not an African American, anon.

she's a south-asian and something else.

sorry.

catagory people ought not be first in line for the most important job in the country.

she's a horror show, inarticulate, a shirker (she ignored the border) and said to have . . . to get her jobs in California (and anon know what she is said to have done with Willie)

 

she's a terrible choice.

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 6:11 p.m. No.21134977   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21134954

every time we get a solar flare most of it shows up as hydrogen, anon.

and then that interacts with the atmosphere and produces the northern lights.

after that science pretends that the hydrogen has no effect because the oil industry doesn't want the world to know that it has to be somehow interact with other things of the earth: and hydrocarbons are one of the geological resources that it might produce.

 

Hydrogen is ubiquitous

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 6:38 p.m. No.21135144   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21135025

ah, I see.

I'm talking about the rate of release of energy.

you're talking about growth.

we're not talking about the same thing.

when I dream of far fetched things usually they don't have to be plausible, or even possible.

the logistics of free energy is a complex issue.

that's what I'm talking about: how it can be safe.

limits on growth? I'm not talking about that.

In my mind the hydrogen based products will eventually be able to float off to other planets in giant arrays: a bubble tech that ever expands, and stuff that is very science fiction but possible given the kind of growth in methods that you are talking about.

 

but the unrestrained release of energy needs to be regulated.

 

same as 'watts/meter-squared' for radiation is an important metric, we will need similar metrics and regulations on the use of all that free energy : how quickly it can be discharged, how much of it can be stored, stuff like that.

Anonymous ID: 1e1c7a July 3, 2024, 6:49 p.m. No.21135206   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

some people are just too clueless for words!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2024/07/03/letter-to-the-editor-a-viable-replacement-for-biden/74281114007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p

"Letter to the editor: A viable replacement for Biden

Ventura County Star

Subscribe to hear this story

 

After the debate, a lot has been made recently about replacing President Biden on the ticket. Governor Newsom continually denies that heโ€™s available. Vice President Harris doesnโ€™t seem electable and no one else has stepped forward.

 

I have a suggestion: Adam Kinzinger. The Jan. 6 hearings showed him as a man of integrity, despite being a Republican. That status might provide him with support among moderate Republicans and Democrats looking for a younger candidate. I know itโ€™s an odd situation, running a Republican as the Democratic candidate, but these are odd times, to say the least."