Anonymous ID: 1d82e5 July 4, 2024, 9:36 a.m. No.21138007   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8048 >>8095 >>8141

0-day exploits are dangerous.

Because by definition, there is no sauce for them yet.

They are known unknowns.

 

Security worth anything must constantly be thinking about known unknowns

 

Fuck known knowns. Once a known is known & sauceable, functionaries can deal with them.

Anonymous ID: 1d82e5 July 4, 2024, 9:49 a.m. No.21138095   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21138007

>Security worth anything must constantly be thinking about known unknowns

 

Which is pretty easy to do.

Simplest example is trading a market.

Does a good trader have a sauce for his next move?

Sure. But it's not a sauce you want to hear. It's not a reverse baraometer like the NYT! If you did, you'd be doing the same thing

Anonymous ID: 1d82e5 July 4, 2024, 10:04 a.m. No.21138190   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8236

>>21138154

>Strategically the best choice would be Tulsi Gabbard

Yeah I don't think I said Ben was the best strategic.

I'm not sure about Tulsi.

For us I understand it but I don't think he needs Democrat vibes right now.

 

I think the R vs D psyop is still strong and there's a number of dumbass retards that would be turned off by it

 

At least as many tards who would be turned off by it than those who would like it

 

That's my take. Someone may have another.