She ain't black
any moar
Michigan Election Fraud article
https://x.com/pjcolbeck/status/1809334290582569109
Courts Assert MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Conducts Unlawful Elections
Per MCL 168.31
, the Michigan Secretary of State is the head election official in the state. If the head election official issues directives regarding the conduct of elections in Michigan that violate the law, is it reasonable to assert that the elections executed under those guidelines are lawful? No.
DISINFORMATION
In our society, we rely upon our judicial system to determine whether or not certain actions by elected officials are considered lawful or not. The 2020 election and every election since then has featured a significant number of lawsuits alleging that election officials were not conducting our elections in a lawful manner.
Whenever the topic of lawsuits and the elections is brought up, however, we are treated to social media and even Big Media quips similar to the following:
Image
Presumably, the basis for this assertion can be found in a July 2022 report called "Lost Not Stolen"
citing 64 cases filed by "Donald Trump and his supporters".
Image
The fact of the matter is that most of these "64 suits" were dismissed on the basis of "standing" not the merits of the evidence provided in the lawsuits. Those who push the 60 lawsuit narrative lean heavily upon the assertion that election results were not overturned as the result of these cases rather than whether or not the elections were conducted in a lawful manner. Unlawful election activities have the tendency to prevent any determination of the true election results through the failure to provide an audit trail or the destruction of election records. There is an overwhelming amount of affidavits and other court exhibits in spite of the unlawful practices of many election officials. In fact, I have first hand knowledge of the veracity of evidence that this "learned study" dismisses without serious examination.
A serious examination of election lawsuits was performed by John Droz. His compilation of 2020 Presidential lawsuits
reveals that in 24 of the 32 cases decided of the merit of the evidence provided, the Trump or GOP plaintiff prevailed. The Epoch Times shared a substantive article on the topic entitled "Trump Won Two-Thirds of Election Lawsuits Where Merits Considered
".
In Michigan, the case for election malfeasance is even clearer.The Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has been found in violation of the law by SEVEN separate courts.
Of course, when someone attempts to bring this fact to light, so-called "fact checkers" in Big Tech rally quickly to prevent the release of such information.
>Michigan Election Fraud article
Please note that Facebook was among the Big Tech collaborators working with the federal government to censor Americans in blatant violation of the First Amendment. See 37 page report by Congressional Weaponization of Government Committee
Big Tech is not the only group engaged in disinformation. Big Media is also all in on the attempt to silence the truth as evidenced by the following article in the Detroit Free Press.
Image
Please note that the article did not address any of the lawsuits cited in this article. The court opinions for Cases #1-#4 below had been issued prior to the date of this article. In this light, it certainly appears that the purpose of the Detroit Free Press article was something other than setting the record straight on Benson’s misconduct.
On a related topic, follow the link to Clara Hendrickson’s story above at Freep.com
. Scroll to the bottom and you’ll notice that Ms. Hendrickson receives supplemental compensation from Report for America which is sponsored by The GroundTruth Project.
Image
According to Influence Watch, the GroundTruth Project is a “left-of-center media” organization. This project in turn is supported by the Boston-based GlobalPost organization.
Image
Why would a Boston-based organization fund reporters in Detroit?
As a point of fact, Jocelyn Benson, Michigan’s current Secretary of State, has already been found in violation of the law by seven separate court decisions. Individually, each of these cases would be concerning, but collectively they indicate a pattern of lawlessness that needs to be addressed if we are to have any confidence in the conduct of our elections under her guidance.
BENSON COURT LOSSES
Let's review the seven cases citing unlawful conduct by the Chief Election Official in Michigan that Big Tech and Big Media refuse to acknowledge.
CASE #1: Genetski v Benson in MI Court of Claims
Image
Image
See full Genetski v Benson court decision
https://www.scribd.com/document/498855479/Genetski-v-Benson-No-20-216-MM-in-the-Court-of-Claims-for-the-State-of-Michigan
>BENSON COURT LOSSES
CASE #2: Davis v Benson in MI Court of Claims
Image
The ruling by the court is provided below:
Image
CASE #3: Carra v Benson in MI Court of Claims
Image
The ruling by the court is provided below:
Image
>>BENSON COURT LOSSES
CASE #4: Johnson v Benson in MI Court of Claims
Image
The ruling by the court is provided below:
Image
CASE #5: O'Halloran v Benson in MI Court of Claims
Image
The ruling by the court is provided below:
Image
>>>BENSON COURT LOSSES
CASE #6: O'Halloran v Benson in MI Court of Appeals
Image
The ruling by the court is provided below:
Image
CASE #7: RNC v Benson in US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Image
The ruling by the court is provided below:
Image
ACCOUNTABILITY
Citizens are looking for accountability. To date there have been zero consequences for the unlawful directives issued by the MI SoS Jocelyn Benson.
Contempt for law
In case being found in violation of the law in seven separate court cases is not enough to demonstrate MI SoS Benson's contempt for the rule of law, listen to the following testimony by her lawyer before the Michigan Court of Appeals in the O'Halloran v Benson trial.
0:14 / 0:41
“I don’t think we would want to create a war between the branches and if there was something telling us to do something and we thought it was OK, we would probably do it. But if it really came to push this conflicts with Constitution or this isn’t something that we can really do because we couldn’t really control it or it’s a bad idea we might just choose not to do it you could leave that statute sitting there and we could continue to issue instructions and give guidance and somebody would probably sue us.” - Attorney Heather Meingast speaking in defense of MI SoS Jocelyn Benson.
Many more examples of contempt for the law where this came from. Stay tuned for another post providing details of Benson's yet to be prosecuted criminal exploits.
Contempt of court
So when do we get to see the consequences for the contempt shown by MI Secretary of State Benson for the rule of law? That remains to be seen.
There was an attempt to hold her in contempt of court when she refused to update her election guidelines per the court order issued by MI Court of Claims Judge Brock Swartzle in O'Halloran v Benson. Attorney Ann Howard filed a motion to hold Benson contempt of court which would have resulted in significant personal consequences for Benson.
Image
Prior to the election, supporters of the plaintiffs rushed to provide the following guidance to poll challengers and election officials in the wake of the inaction taken by the MI SoS.
Image
Despite this guidance, the unlawful directives issued by the MI SoS held sway with most election officials.
The Michigan Supreme Court further complicated the situation by intervening
in the case and placed an injunction upon the lower court to prevent such a motion from being adopted by the court. Notably, the Michigan Supreme Court did not rule that Benson’s directives were lawful. They simply prevented the lower court from filing charges against Benson effectively enabling her to execute an unlawful election. The damage was done, however, and election officials executed the 2022 election under the unlawful guidance of the MI SoS.
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson should be tried criminally for a growing list of statutory violations without remorse. The Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel or a Biden appointed US District Attorney would need to pursue such action. How does a criminal complaint get traction when those sympathetic to the criminal actions taken are placed in the position to determine whether or not a crime has been committed?
CONCLUSION
The 2020 and 2022 statewide elections in Michigan were conducted under the guidance of unlawful directives by Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. There is no reason to believe that the 2024 election will be any different until the court system holds Benson accountable for her lawless actions. It remains to be seen how or when this accountability will occur. Until it does, the citizens of Michigan will continue to have reason for concern in the results of any election conducted in their state.