Christfags and spambots don't like we challenge their dogma.
kek
>go ahead challenge me
This isn't really the place for that.
But sure, I challenge you to prove that the God you claim exists, does in fact exist.
And that the book written about said God is in fact inspired by said God and to be taken seriously as a literal tale of the supernatural.
Go.
>well, tbw you have been lied to al your life
I know.
So have you, but for some reason you cling to the idea that the one ancient book that has controlled the minds of your family for generations is the ONE thing not lying to you.
>Extensive personal God fanfic lore.
Explaining your interpretation of a book that I still don't have any basis for taking seriously doesn't prove your point.
>GOD IS WITHIN YOU
Ok… that means literally nothing.
>god does exist, else you wouldnt
Circular logic.
Man thinks up God -God creates man -> Man thinks up God
Your argument only works on someone who already believes that life needs YOUR god to exist, which I don't.
>but spend enough time here and listen very carefully and you will learn the truth hidden from man
True. Thank anons for that.
>seems you have not, nor have taken the time to do so.
Or seems you have only taken the things that align with your beliefs instead of looking critically at all information.
My information posted here is BS, discernment is key.
>LIAR - not even once did i state that
You said you were a Christfag, that implies that you believe in the bible and the new testament. So yes, you did say that.
>LIAR - it means god is not in heaven he is within man
But if I don't believe in a God, then you telling me that the thing I don't believe in is inside me means nothing to me…
>LIAR - you would not exist if not for gods creation of you
I explained it to you… Are you really that stupid?
>you want to fight there is no god, you want to fight the bible is a liem you want to fight that god is not within, your red haring statements lead you to an invalid argument.
Someone call grammar kitty, this is really bad. kek.
No, I want you to back up your claims instead of forcing a dogma.
>I am so there fore not god created me
According to your dogma that you've still failed to convince me off. But instead calls me a liar when I explain to you how everything you say is based in nothing but hopes and feelings.
>shame you lie to yourself so much
Kek. The irony.
>if you were more honest with yourself you would also know the truth hiden from man. but as the rest of the sheep, you are lost in the wilderness of your own demise.
If only you were bright enough to follow your own advise…
>and i aint got time for that
>filtered
Fucking Kek. !! You were the one who started this interaction. You asked me to challenge you. And now you rage quit.
Holy shit, you can't make this shit up.
The truth is found here by people like me who dares question the narratives and dig for the truth.
I guess the dark ages of Europe wasn't a thing then? Kek
The denial is strong in this one.
Isn't it kinda funny?
The moment they feel their worldview is challenged their start filtering (or at least say they do).
They act so sure of themselves right up until they have to explain it. kek.