Devolution in Public

"…I don't think we're ever going to have to be debating whether Trump implementing Devolution was actually moral, in the public sphere. I don't think we're going to get there."

Jon Herold

@patel_patriot

2:05:20

Wild episode of Devolution Power Hour there, mainly on recent Supreme Court wins: Chevron, etc."Winning cascade"is the term floated by BurningBright. Has a ring to it…

re Devolution in Public:

Can anons imagine the psychological energy unleashed if Devolution evidence went mainstream in the next Administration? White Hats would "need" to mass-produce elaborate cover stories for the astonishing network of unofficial revelations. But they could make the official cover stories transparently false and ridiculous - with zillions of Q-proof Easter eggs embedded, of course.

They could pump out so much hilarious junk that even normies would eventually say, "No, Devolution is obviously true and historical fact, Mr. President! Come back here and confess you saved us from the horrors! The public demands you admit you're Q+! White-pill us, now and forevermore! EEAAAAYAARGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!"

Anon sure hopes this notion of "Devolution in Public" doesn't catch on, and inconvenience anyone.

:-D

https://rumble.com/v558fp0-devolution-power-hour-ep-263-1030-pm-et-.html?mref=2ay364&mc=b2hfe