Anonymous ID: 19364b July 6, 2024, 3:54 p.m. No.21150656   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0681 >>0695 >>1129 >>1137 >>1192

Just realized something. Could be wrong…

I think the NPC mind is prone to projecting and internalizing, so all the "cognitive decline" portrayals of Bidan… Not even the portrayals but the pundit talking points that are challenging him… I think the liberal voters are being challenged because if their President has cognitive decline, it means they do. I mean they will internalize it and have to process it like it's about them.

I think the media used to (still does) report on things in a manner where the viewer or listener is intended to emotionally relate to their public champions. For example…

>Obama is an eloquent and articulate black man.

Nevermind the fact that the radio host was condemned for the statement. Democrats will think of themselves as eloquent and articulate because the champion they support is labeled as such. The fact that that host was condemned just helps separate the internalization process from being realized. Likewise the antithesis is true. "George Bush jr is a bumbling fool, therefore Republicans are as well." "Therefore, Liberals aren't."

The negative reporting on Bidan is actually an attack on the democrat voters themselves, and it will hopefully force or nudge people to stop identifying with that side of the political spectrum because of the negativity. The ones that remain are forced to accept this notion of cognitive failures within themselves.

I don't know… maybe I could have articulated this better, but what do you think?

Anonymous ID: 19364b July 6, 2024, 5:23 p.m. No.21151007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1009 >>1014 >>1069

>>21150992

Well we can safely assume Obama's kids belong to that friend couple of theirs.

Some tranny couples are both flips, and it's the "man" that gives birth. In the case of the Bush's, I'm assuming there's a non-public wife.

The Rothschilds often fuck all sorts of randoms to create bastards for body doubles etc.

>>21150994

Was your question really "subverted from what?" or was it "subverted by what?"

Anonymous ID: 19364b July 6, 2024, 6:04 p.m. No.21151154   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1191

>>21151129

I think it's slightly more than just the hero. I think it's a process of pronouns and tone of voice or inflection. Consider song lyrics that have one line begin with "I" and the next begin with "You."

People can identify with either. News anchors can wield this I think. I can make you think this by saying "I think" at the end.

Anonymous ID: 19364b July 6, 2024, 6:18 p.m. No.21151223   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1236

>>21151192

I think the point of the abruptness in the movie is to throw democrat voters out of the back of the truck in the hairpin turns.

The Trump campaign will appear more stable too. Announces VP announcement with a scheduled date. Certainty. Dems in shambles. Uncertainty.

Anonymous ID: 19364b July 6, 2024, 6:40 p.m. No.21151307   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21151281

It's like the problem is everything, from the ground up. Saying it's "systemic" doesn't actually describe how bad it is or how many variables are factors.

>>21151290

>I marvel that I am supposed to be built for such a time as this sometimes, but it's true.

It's difficult to see sometimes because of all the brainwashing overlays. Definitely a paradigm shift.