One feature of the board lately seems to be that the squabble shills, scripts that pretend to be idiots bantering about nonsense, seem to be the main features during long hours of inactivity.
during these 'low news cycle' times there are few links to real stories, no digs, and no new memes. It's rehash of conflict scripts, like you are hearing the conversations in an unsupervised detention room for students in detention, most of whom are bullies or discontents.
Note how my comment is immediately met with terse idiocy of a chatty gatekeeper making a statement that has nothing to do about anything but sounds out a current psyop effort of the shill teams.
if my assumptions are confirmed to be true then they must be true?
my descriptions are notes, and do not need comments.
the festering shill-crews that lurk here are obvious. I merely describe them in broad terms with notes about what they seem to be.
if my notes are incorrect there is no consequence. however you are too quick to respond to my throw-away commentry to be an organic presence here.
do you respond to those who talk about conflict constantly here? probably not.
It seems to me your purpose is to draw effort from the real people here, waste their time, and be a gatekeeper. I didn't respond to anyone with my first post and yet it drew a conflict response.
and now you , a second person do another conflict responise pretending to some psychological 'you are not OK' authority.
and you just provide more evidence as to the nature of who and what are in these breads during the slow hour.
thank you for providing more evidence with you false-diagnosis and 'you are not OK' response.
I'm sure you're OK. You're most likely paid to be here and you are trying to cause distress to the ones who are not paid but post here for other purposes than what bosses and paymasters demand of them.
have a great day.
what purpose would I have to review your nacent 'you are not OK' commentary?
nothing you say has any other purpose but to make you seem as a gate keeper here.
go badger someone else, ah but there are few real people here so I am you target.
the know it all gatekeepers get filtered by me anon, good bye.
it's a slow hour.
I guess everyone is waiting to see what kind of nonsense the Democrats are going to be trying this week to deal with their King Leer situation and Lady McJill
as I said, I wrote a throw away commentary and if it's wrong it's wrong.
slow hour means that the banter bots are 'on', correct?
What am I trying to 'make work'?
I unfiltered you because I realized you are making a cry for interation.
have a hug, anon. you don't need to spend so much effort debunking or whatever you think you're doing for me.
and your picture of the kid with the (you), what was that about?
is that what you think of me?
your assumptions are fowl, anon.
that's NOT OK.
so maybe you have some work you need to do too, on your own methods.
I'm sure that dear man in the picture you posted is actually a joy to be with at times, so why use him as a prop?
have a blessed day and stop posting pictures of people that supposedly represent deficiency and idiocy becuase it's so unkind.
anyway, the news cycle is going to start up soon enough.
did you see that Donald Trump as truthed?
in Early march?
I didn't see any two letter time-of-day acronyms this morning.
that's different.
waldo
the conflict bot continues in it's relentless effort to draw out satanic anger from people.
it fails.
this is someone self-dealing in DOD.
most likely they own shares in these companies, or have a stake in this business.
this money is a payout to frens.
it ought to be investigated as fraud waste and abuse.
gosh persona,
did you know that for those who became slavs the other option was just being killed by the conquerors?
it can't give up.
the program is designed to just keep up doing it's evil-anger farming till the end of the bread.
note that it also posts degenerate images.
the morality of 3000 years ago has little or nothing to do with your concepts of libertad in the present day.
why focus just on the Jewish or Hebrew point of view on these matters?
why ignore what other nations around them did?
why ignore what some Muslims do even to this day?
why ignore what the Roman's did?
you don't have a ballanced view of what slavery was as an institution.
you also ignore the modern slave systems of Human Resources and 'employment', which is a form of bondage.
you only focus on some small aspect and thus are presenting incomplete and useless information, just a chattering noise bot ignoring the larger social issues and what it means to be free.
did you know that without 'Slavery' we would have no concept of 'Liberty'?
and the term 'libertus' means 'freed slave'
something to ponder
you seem so sure of things, why do you need my approval?
"You'll never get to Heaven if you Break my Heart"
it was either this or Boy George 'do you really want to hurt me' so . . . maybe I'll post that next. this bread is defunct anyway.
see you in the next bread!
have a glorious day!