They're on the same team for a reason.
>The holocaust happened. Get over it.
Yes, and notice that old guy had to stand up because he kneeled.
>Remember the 6 million, goyim. Or I will have you fired and/or killed.
People are capable of discernment.
Well you seem adamant about defending the holocaust myth which means you have to defend the numbers they have spouted since it happened.
Was it 3 million? If it can change so rapidly to suit any conversation, shouldn't it be questioned? But that can't happen in multiple countries including some of our own states now.
You're obfuscating the conversation which is a jewish trick.
>So you claim the holocaust wouldn't have happened, but can't tell me how many actually died?
This is not a simple question.
If you go on TV right now and say only 3 million died like you are suggesting, you would be fired from whatever job you have, destroyed in the press, and ostracized for the remainder of your life. In certain countries, the feed would be cut, and charges would be lain against you from the state, and you would be jailed for questioning the holocaust narrative.
3 million is the number you went with, kike.
>I asked you a question
No, you asked 2 questions in one. Thus, you were implying my position and answer to questions you implied through your double negative part 1 question of a 2 part question.
Let me break it down for you, retarded kike.
You're probably a white hat larping as a kike but anyway…
>So you claim the holocaust wouldn't have happened, but can't tell me how many actually died?
You said I claim that the holocaust wouldn't have happened. This means you think I'm saying what exactly? You're implying something with this question. You should rewrite this, so I don't have to do the mental gymnastics for you to understand what it is you're implying.
>but can't tell me how many actually died?
If the numbers change over the decades, and you even change them in this conversation (dropping from 6 million to 3 million), and we are not allowed to question this in many countries, it's very likely a fraud has been committed.
>It's funny, because I made a fictional shitpost of yours going with "maybe it was 3 million".
How are we supposed to have a discussion arriving at truth if you can change your intention for statements part way through? You are the one that initially stated 6 million did not die, yet you are defending the holocaust as though it happened as we are taught in school. If you were to publicly state only 3 million died, you would go to jail in several countries.
If I say only 5 people died, you would still run with your psychopath gaslighting, forgiving generations of lies and atrocities carried out in the war against "anti-semitism."
I initially accused you of defending the narrative. You disagree with the narrative, but are calling me the psychopath while defending the narrative. I could ask you the same question. How many people died? And you would say it doesn't matter because it was an atrocity. If it doesn't matter, why are people going to jail for asking how many died?
>So you claim the holocaust wouldn't have happened, but can't tell me how many actually died?
Since you still won't clarify what you mean by this, let me take another stab at it.
You're saying that if my claim that the holocaust didn't happen is true, that it would mean that the holocaust wouldn't have happened because jews did nothing wrong? So are you admitting the jews did something wrong to get themselves rounded up into camps?
It's confusing, and I believe it's intentionally confusing. If you'd like to address any of this at any time, please feel free to do so.
>No, that was you.
I accused you of defending the narrative which is 6 million jews died. You accused me of suggesting the number was half. No where in my statements would I have suggested such a figure. You arbitrarily conflated my doubt in 6 million with an arguably equally substantial number of 3 million to push your psychopath accusation gaslighting.
>If it was 5 family members or 5 of your children
Now it just sounds like you're threatening me because you're either insane to suggest that the Jewish deaths in the holocaust amounting to 5 is somehow worthy of guilt tripping the entire western world for generations using billions of dollars of media propaganda and lawsuits to enforce it. That's psychopathy.
>I'm asking you how many died.
The reason we're having this conversation is because nobody knows how many actually died in labor camps. People only have theories ranging from 200,000 to 500,000 at most, from incidental deaths of circumstance, not intentional murder.
Families of 5 die in car accidents often. It's not a worldwide tragedy worthy of billions of dollars in documentaries and media bombardment.
THEY BUILT MONUMENTS OF US TO THE SKY WHEN WE SAVED THEM FROM THE HOLOGAUST
Not talking about that. Talking about Spacey's one-eye symbolism touching his glasses implying he knew what happened.
>Imaginary
An imaginary number that suited your agenda.
I already stated nobody knows the answer because the official numbers keep changing, but the official narrative of 6 million stays the same. You're happy to defend the holocaust narrative at 3 million despite that no longer being categorically speaking a genocide. You're willing to gaslight goyim even if the number was only 5. The fact of the matter is the numbers can't be questioned or jail time. Even your line of questions would equate to jail time, so what is your agenda here other than to shill the myth at whatever cost?
It shouldn't.
100,000 people could have died to typhus and/or starvation in total across dozens of camps. That's not murder, you stupid nigger.
3 million technically speaking is not genocide. The reason 6 million is always stated by every public official is because there were constant news reports prior to WW2 that 6 million jews existed in the entire world, so when the holocaust myth was forged, it made Nationalism seem responsible for being capable of genociding an entire race of people.
The reason you stated 3 million initially is because it still sounds "genocidy" for your shilling goals.
If so, why don't we talk about the millions of Germans that were intentionally starved to death in POW camps?
Jews weren't even intentionally starved. They were incidentally starved due to the collapsing war effort. That's not murder. It's not nearly systemic to the point that a documentary would hold up at the level of the academy awards like Schindler's List.
Blacked
>HOW MANY WERE MURDERED BY YOUR NAZI BROTHERS, WHO LOVED THE ROTHSCHILD BANKERS?
If you lived in Germany, you would go to jail for this statement.
What do you think "questioning the holocaust" means?
If only 3 million jews died, in a world where less than 7 million jews live, would that technically speaking be considered a genocide?
I'm asking you what the technical, textbook definition of "genocide" is.
But continue with your gaslighting psyop. I will see you next bread.
So you admit the war in Gaza is a genocide…
>If only 5 jews died in the holocaust, it would still be called the holocaust and still be considered a genocide.
>The war in Gaza is not a genocide of Palestinians.
Jewish minds at work.
So if there was an armed conflict rebellion on the part of Germany prior to them being placed in camps, we can just consider it not a genocide because they were at war with each other?
Germany = Jail time
I mean German Jews vs Germans
I see the same posts every bread calling out "muh joo posters" which seems like these inorganic shills that image is talking about. There are rules against muh joo posting on the boards. I don't fucking get it.
You didn't ask a question.
I don't know that anybody was murdered. All I have to go on is propaganda and one show trial. Laws limit speech about it. Internet limits conversation about it.
I've seen some suggestions that only around 200,000 people died of starvation and typhus at the end of the war, that the camps weren't for killing. You're spinning that to be murder. You're spinning any number to still be a genocide and holocaust.
Yeah well if it wasn't overtly stated before, I'll say it now. I can't decipher any of this shit.
>Nuremberg? 99.9% Nazis were let go, especially the medical Nazis, known for "corona"
Doesn't negate the fact that the "jewish murder camp" portion was a show.
>Okay, so not a single Jew or prisoner was murdered.
I have no way to know that this happened at all in a systemic way.
What the fuck is this shit
>Working people to death
Just sounds like you're changing the narrative while defending the official narrative.
You know how insane that sounds, right?
>It wasn't a death camp.
>It was a work camp where people were worked to death.
>Therefore, it was a death camp, but for the sake of your online demographic, I'll admit to it being a work camp as long as it's known that the work led to death.
Then it wasn't 100% a genocide.