Anonymous ID: 12dcac July 9, 2024, 7:36 a.m. No.21166870   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6885 >>7012 >>7069 >>7137

Chairman Jordan: It's interesting to not who Mr. Colangelo listed as his references when he applied for a job at the Justice Department. He listed Tom Perez, former DNC chair, and Jeff Zients, who is now [Biden's] Chief of Staff. The head of the DNC, and the Biden White House Chief of Staff, those were his references, That's the guy who went to work to be the lead prosecutor on the case against President Trump. Alvin Bragg, Matthew Colangelo, picked their target, searched for a crime, and then they prosecuted President Trump.

Anonymous ID: 12dcac July 9, 2024, 7:40 a.m. No.21166891   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Plaskett: Project2025 plans to upend structures, institutions, and the basic rights that have supposedly been afforded to Americans to make it great. It's a playbook for Donald Trump's second term, and a plan for the destruction for America as we know it.

Anonymous ID: 12dcac July 9, 2024, 7:44 a.m. No.21166917   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7012 >>7069 >>7137

Plaskett: The Project2025 playbook is a plan to give Donald Trump the powers of a dictator, just as he wants. That's the planโ€ฆDonald Trump is a clear and present danger to the continuation of American democracy as we know it.

[Plaskett PANIC]

Anonymous ID: 12dcac July 9, 2024, 8:05 a.m. No.21167019   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Judge Wilson [Weaponization Hearing]: The jury instructions given by Judge Merchan were illegal in that they included these additional charges, and allowed for a non-unamimous verdict. A non-unamimous verdict is unprecedented in any felony trial in American jurisprudence, and recently, the US Supreme Court reiterated the necessity for a unamimous jury verdict in the case of Erlinger vs United States.

Anonymous ID: 12dcac July 9, 2024, 8:15 a.m. No.21167058   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7069 >>7137

Davidson: Has there ever been a citizen, not named Donald Trump, who has been prosecuted with these same crimes anywhere in America?

Smith: It depends on what one considers the crime. For example, they'll say lots of people are prosecuted for false records under New York law. What they're not prosecuted for is for false records covering up a crime under New York law that makes it illegal to violate some unnamed law to influence an election, and no, I've never seen anything like that.