> Although the first 46 or so posts are attributed to 'Q', none of them are signed by Q or anyone.
I got a question about the graphic/map, ordering essential to follow. There is no numbering of posts in said graphic. How is it anons began using post numbers to decode when it was never mentioned or in the graphic? Only timestamps were mentioned.
Thanks. The only post I recall an overt post number reference was #1776, a stand alone post with a pic of a POTUS doc with #1776 written by hand of #45. Beyond that, when reading the early drops I only see mention of the timestamps being critical. Is it possible the whole post number decoding is our own construct that may be distracting us from doing what we were told?