They really want to push the idea that filtering is the Anon thing to do…
kek
>Anons not to filter
What are the benefits of applying blinders in an information war?
Situational awareness is key.
<Cute, non-tag you made there. Scared of direct confrontations?
>>21173590 (me)
>>21173610 (me)
I really don't care who you filter or don't. The option is there, use it if you feel like it.
I'm only commenting on the push of the idea that real anons filter all the time.
I've been here for 7+ years and I haven't filtered once.
And yes, Q did say "No filters". That's one reason why I don't. But my interpretation of that post is not yours.
You can filter all you want. Just don't brag about it like it's a cool thing to do. It's basically admitting defeat, especially if you announce it.
>It's a heads up for others, not admitting defeat
Aha… it's consensus cracking. Gotcha. And you're calling me a shill. kek.
>while attempting to create the consensus that filtering is a sign of defeat
Not trying to create any sort of consensus. It's an objective fact. It's rage quitting, especially if you feel the need to announce it.
>yourself as a source of authority
I you find some sort of authority in me having been here for a long time, that's on you not me. It doesn't mean shit.
>Better luck next time
You too. o7
Now you're doing that cute non-tagging again. kek.
Can't you just filter me, it's clearly what you really want.
>I don't care what clown you are.
Likewise.
>I never called you OSS yesterday
Did I say you did? I don't recall doing that.
>so that was someone else
Is that why you immediately became defensive?
>I'm not the one that's displaying the patterns
Keep telling yourself that.
Sorry wrong number, I'm still not ÆI
>I never said you did, I said that I didn't.
>Wasn't defensiveness. Merely stating fact.
Alright buddy.
>Bait and insult.
>Who has repeatedly shown that pattern over the years?
You?
While I do love me some board lore - I don't really care for namefags so I have no idea.
Interesting twist, going from accusing me of being every namefag who ever posted on this board to now discussing namefag lore.
You seem a bit obsessed with namefags?
>You seem like you're trying to slide and leech as many yous off me as possible
You're the one who keeps the conversation going. I just reply.
You've had every chance to filter me so far - it is what you're advocating for, right?
>I'm in a good mood today, so I don't mind padding your paycheck.
Can you paypal me?
>But I thought filtering is a sign of defeat according to you.
It is, but it apparently isn't to you. So it shouldn't be an issue for you.
Why do you care how I perceive filtering?
>Tranimae used to say that all the time too
Good for it.
>Are you just deliberately using his patterns like a mimic or are they your patterns?
These "patterns" only exist in your mind.
>you started this chain with me over me announcing filtering a shill
Wat?
Bread isn't even over and you already forget how this chain started?
Joe is that you?
Pics or it didn't happen
If proven wrong declare victory.
If you believe it hard enough it might become true.
Especially if you don't tag the one you declare victory over. It just shows confidence
kek
Thanks.
But I'm sorry to say your standards for a "beautiful woman" are pretty low.
Or mine are too high?
Holy shit. You are really obsessed. Kek.
Keep screaming your paranoid fuelled schizo assertions into the void.
It's funny to see you grasp for straws.
>Showing your age, or lack thereof….
Do ugly women get prettier as I get older?
I'm 34 btw.
>For a trial setting…
Does the environment change the beauty of a woman?
A beautiful woman is beautiful in any setting.
>>21173920 (me)
Fair, I misunderstood your point.
Mainly because I disagree with calling them "eye candy", but to each their own.
o7
Correct.
You're the one being mad because I called out the push for it as being a good thing.
I never said what anons should or shouldn't do, I only pointed out the obvious push to make anons self-censor and when challenged I shared my opinion on why I think it's bad.
I never told anyone what to do, in fact I said the opposite.
Nice try though.
>That's where you're wrong. I'm not mad. I feel nothing but minor amusement at your attempts.
Is that why you keep this up? Trying to scare me, or something (I'm really not sure what you think you're getting out of it) by telling me what shill you think I am?
Kek.
>That looks like trying to tell someone what to do to me.
I was sharing my opinion. You can do what you want. I just told you how that action is perceived by anons who thinks like me…
>like it's a cool thing to do.
I'm sorry you don't have a good enough grasp on the english language to make that distinction.
>The shills would love for people to think that considering every tactic and narrative they have is reliant upon forced visibility.
Forced visibility?
No one is forcing you to do anything?
Also, you have a scroll wheel or another means of scrolling the bread, right?
And I never told you not to filter, I challenged the push to make anons filtering anything they dislike the cool thing…
>What? KEK!
<(I'm really not sure what you think you're getting out of it)
>Oh, so you speak for everyone that thinks like you?
Yes, we all do. On this topic. Due to the fact that we think alike. kek, you're unravelling.
>How do you know who thinks like you do?
I don't? Not until they share their opinion? Did I say I did?
>You green texted your own words for context for the answer and then tried admonishing me for my English?
I did, And I am. Tell me how that was wrong? It was from your post, and I used it to underscore my point. I assumed you understood that even though I took the quote from your post that it was my words. You did, right?
>"Just don't brag about it like it's a cool thing to do." You're not strong enough to force anyone.
Good thing I'm not trying to then, huh?
>Go on, point them all out.
You mean like all of those showing you support for your opinion?
Please point them out.
We've slid this bread for 40+ posts and no one else has commented on it.
Fucking kek
>If you're going to point out a flaw in someone's usage of the English language it's usually prudent to include the example you're referring to rather than quoting your own words.
I was quoting my words in your post.
Sorry that is so hard for you to grasp.
>"Just don't do."
<"…like it's the cool thing to do"
Fucking retard. Kek.
>Straw man.
Yes, built by you.
Fucking KEK, I can't make this shit up!!
HAhahahaHahaHahAHHAhaah!!!!
>So your words were the flaw in the English then?
Wat?
>Your post formatting reeks of OSS right now.
Ok buddy. Is the OSS you're talking about in the room with you right now?
>I never said you were OSS,
I never said you did. I said you were obsessed.
>but you are a clown
Ok, buddy.
Is it like a ego thing? Is it because you somehow feel important if you think you are personally fighting one of the named famefags on the board?
Your obsession is really weird.
And he continues undeterred…
I'm getting sad for you dude. That obsession of yours cannot be healthy.
I would tell you to seek a therapist but I wouldn't trust those either, so there really isn't much luck for you I guess…