TYB
"You all saw it for yourselves."
Notice that phrase being used a lot by the gaslighters as of late.
VaticanClown replies to me because him and his miserable band of clown chucklefucks want what can come from me for themselves, so much so that they try and imitate as much as they can in hopes that it will give them the same results. It's not in the pixels though, is it, you evil little ratfucks.
>21173590
The shills have really been trying to convince Anons not to filter. Even tried using an Alinsky tactic on a drop "Q said no filters, that means you're not supposed to filter." No, people are free to filter what they wish. Ruins the whole compelled visibility/forced listening that the shills rely on if people filter them. Filtered.
Imagine being paid by the government to disrupt and stifle the free thought of others, and think you're in the right for doing so.
>Just don't brag about it like it's a cool thing to do.
Good thing I reset my filters. How about you not try telling people what to do, asswipe. I don't care if you don't like it. It's a heads up for others, not admitting defeat, and I find it very interesting that you're trying to tell someone what to do while attempting to create the consensus that filtering is a sign of defeat while posturing yourself as a source of authority (been here 7+ years). Better luck next time.
>c283b7
>Aha… it's consensus cracking. Gotcha. And you're calling me a shill. kek.
Announcing a filter of a shill is consensus cracking? Odd that you would equate it to that.
>Not trying to create any sort of consensus. It's an objective fact.
That's exactly what you're doing and then claiming it fact.
> It's rage quitting, especially if you feel the need to announce it.
Moar consensus generation attempt. You're attempting to write the rules on filtering now.
>I you find some sort of authority in me having been here for a long time, that's on you not me. It doesn't mean shit.
I never found any authority in you, I stated what you were doing, an objective fact.
Tranimae
I don't care what clown you are. I never called you OSS yesterday either, so that was someone else. I'm not the one that's displaying the patterns of those three while being an agitant and trying to create the consensus that filtering is a sign of defeat.
Odd how you started up after the post about being paid by the government to fuck with the free thought of others and you pipe up trying to admonish me for announcing a filter while simultaneously trying to create the consensus that filtering is a sign of defeat.
>Did I say you did? I don't recall doing that.
I never said you did, I said that I didn't.
>Is that why you immediately became defensive?
Wasn't defensiveness. Merely stating fact.
Bait and insult. Bait and insult. Bait and insult. Who has repeatedly shown that pattern over the years?
Now you're jumping to conclusions. All those times SmokingPepe would post that meme with the telephone when someone asked for Q and he would say, "Q's not in, blah, blah, blah, leave a message with the Highest Ranking Anon." Did you think he was referring to himself when he said that facetiously?
>You seem a bit obsessed with namefags?
You seem like you're trying to slide and leech as many (You)s off me as possible. I'm in a good mood today, so I don't mind padding your paycheck.
>You've had every chance to filter me so far
But I thought filtering is a sign of defeat according to you.
>You're the one who keeps the conversation going. I just reply.
Tranimae used to say that all the time too. Odd, huh? Are you just deliberately using his patterns like a mimic or are they your patterns?
>Why do you care how I perceive filtering?
The same question could be asked why you started this chain with me over me announcing filtering a shill. And now that the circle-jerk has come around completely, fuck off.
Don't care which Absolute Retard that was, but it was without a doubt an Absolute Retard. The little fed crew that like to trade dick pics in a Discord channel.
If they were really winning they wouldn't post the CP. They post the CP when Anons are beating them badly.
Or gore.
Maybe the clown should show moar OSS post formatting, Tranimae phrases, Mimic vocabulary/behavior. It's probably all been samefag all along.
I'm not the one that tried to create the consensus that filtering shills and announcing that filter as a heads up for others is a bad thing.
>You're the one being mad because I called out the push for it as being a good thing.
That's where you're wrong. I'm not mad. I feel nothing but minor amusement at your attempts.
>I never told anyone what to do, in fact I said the opposite.
"Just don't brag about it like it's a cool thing to do." Those are your words right? "Just don't do." That looks like trying to tell someone what to do to me. But when it comes to filtering you just "implied" that it's a weakness, that it's a sign of defeat. The shills would love for people to think that considering every tactic and narrative they have is reliant upon forced visibility.
>980dc3
Oh look, the failfag mimic pipes up after his "buddy" had his face used to mop the floor.
>Trying to scare me,
What? KEK!
>I just told you how that action is perceived by anons who thinks like me…
Oh, so you speak for everyone that thinks like you? How do you know who thinks like you do?
>>like it's a cool thing to do.
>I'm sorry you don't have a good enough grasp on the english language to make that distinction.
You green texted your own words for context for the answer and then tried admonishing me for my English?
>>Forced visibility?
>No one is forcing you to do anything?
"Just don't brag about it like it's a cool thing to do." You're not strong enough to force anyone.
>I don't? Not until they share their opinion? Did I say I did?
So who other than you this bread has shared their opinion that filtering is a sign of defeat? Go on, point them all out.
>I did, And I am. Tell me how that was wrong?
If you're going to point out a flaw in someone's usage of the English language it's usually prudent to include the example you're referring to rather than quoting your own words.
>Good thing I'm not trying to then, huh?
Then why did you try to? "Just don't do."
>You mean like all of those showing you support for your opinion?
Straw man.
>I was quoting my words in your post.
So your words were the flaw in the English then? Your post formatting reeks of OSS right now.
I never said you were OSS, I said you were using the post formatting style he does. You also display the bait and insult routine of Tranimae. I don't care which clown you are, but you are a clown.
>I said you were obsessed.
I don't imitate you.
>Ok, buddy.
The mimic used to love saying that last year all the time.
I'm not arguing because I want to. A clown push needed countering.