Pass
Anyone notice that nobody, from any faction, seems to have a problem with mass surveillance? Anon would think that, if there's a problem with corrupt actors in government abusing children, that allowing a government such powers would pose a very serious risk to children's safety.
Not really that odd.
See:
They just want to contain these discussions away from the eyes of the public while they attempt to fabricate an excuse for their surveillance systems.
>The Internet should always remain an OPEN DISCUSSION Forum.
There's no "remain" about it. Even here you get censored if you discuss anything outside of a very narrow scope, pointing towards the end goal of destroying the west. Every shitty thing done by everyone else gets ignored/censored.
>>21178225 (Me)
For example. Were you aware that much of the destructive trends of modern feminism is a South Korean export, from a cult led by a woman who actually claims to be God's Earthly incarnation?
For a movement that cares deeply about destructive woke bullshit, and religious fraud, one would think this would be a far larger issue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Mission_Society_Church_of_God