>Q told us JA would be brought forward in June
<"would be brought forward"
Made no such claim. Anons' own presumptions don't count as "Q told us"
MASONS are brick LAYERs
The point is that that's not what you in the first place.
"Q told us JA would be brought forward in June" is not the same as saying "Q telling us that JUNE would be the estimated time that the information relating to SR>DNC>MS13>JA would be "brought forward"". Even though you may have intended the latter in place of the former, two completely different statements
Another point while on the topic (for the board, not for the non rt): What's often conveniently overlooked, is ETA, not definite time of arrival, Estimated, as in not guaranteed to occur in June, yet likely. If Q had not said ETA, the concern would be fine. however, CYA, Q covered his ass on that one. No muh June required. Settle for July. And keep celebrating your Independence.
Who said that the autists are gone?
>Do not fall victim to con artists.
>Use LOGIC.
>Stay on point.
Great for him. Point? Not worth discussion.
Also, was it US ANONS that were promised an ETA, or comms to others watching?
file name related
FBI LAYER has layers & layers of meaning…
We have it ALL, includes 2013/14. Is the implication that PS' & LP's FBI LAYING goes back that far in time?