Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 10:12 p.m. No.21217024   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7054 >>7068 >>7131 >>7233

>>21217007

>We almost lost on Saturday. But we didn't cause God caught the ball for us. That's a good thing. Life has variables.

This is a narrative in your head, not rational thinking. You're basically saying that Q's movie is real.

>>21217011

I have no idea how anything in this post is supposed to confirm anything you've been saying.

>Understand the fist pumps are acknowledging God's hand in this battle.

So the Q post depicting Trump raising his fist and saying "fight fight fight" is not indicative of Q constructing a movie for a great awakening, but it was just Trump remembering a Q post in the organic/divine moment and re-enacted the Q post for posterity?

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 10:36 p.m. No.21217113   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7163

>>21217054

Let me try to share my perspective to try to explain why I think you're retarded. I'm open to correction.

When Q says "saving israel for last" I think his specific reason is because of how brainwashed most of the country, right and left, are into supporting Israel or Jews in general. The religious right thinks they are the chosen people. The atheist left wants to live vicariously through them, join them, or imitate them as "rich, educated, successful victims" of the same vein. If it's one of the most deep rooted brainwashing problems clouding the minds of the vast majority in the nation, it would make sense to approach this last and not talk about it.

That all being said, wouldn't it be pertinent to create events exactly the way you, as a religious person, are seeing them, in order to guide you toward developing awareness in the manner Q is working toward?

>>21217068

I will check it out. So far you sound just as insane there as you do here. It's like you don't know what's going on but are talking about things almost beyond tangential to what is being talked about. For example, the topic of the waves. Q says news unlocks map. The suggestion is that the National Geographic article is largely bullshit but has codes in it that link to Q posts which the infographic reveals. You then talk about the waves mentioned in the article.

 

Picrel reads like projection to me.

I've dealt with homeless people before, and you sound like them.

I seem to find someone like you everywhere I go on the internet and spend enough time. Just my luck I have to deal with you on this website. The trouble for me is that there are incredibly based anons here that could have a lot to say, but you seem to be clogging things up. I'm guilty of this too. Q team is either profoundly tolerant or corralling us here for who knows how many reasons.

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 11:04 p.m. No.21217200   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21217192

Bro, if nobody saw the shooter with the ladder it's because God miracalized the audience into not seeing him which went unnoticed by you because you're a sinning disbeliever in the miracles of God. You only believed the bullet dodge because it was captured on camera which means your faith needs confirmation which means it's not actually faith which means you're delusional.

Whoops, I broke your mind. You are now suicidal.

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 11:08 p.m. No.21217216   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7243

>>21217206

If I guess, then you can correct me, but you aren't showing me that you understand what I'm saying. You aren't even correcting me. You just went on a lecture about how the chosen is stolen, but I already implied that in my statements. You thought that because I didn't specify it how you would have that I must not have known anything about what you were talking about.

You have serious conversation and debate problems.

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 11:29 p.m. No.21217293   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7320

>>21217263

>See how Trump held up the Bible and recognized God's hand when they wanted to storm the WH.

You have to prove that that's what's happening. I don't see it. That doesn't make you right or wrong, but if you can't explain how that makes sense in a way that I can see it, then I can't agree with you.

 

>Yet many side with Satan and scoff, mock, and deny.

You're conflating two things that are not related.

Q is claiming to plan events that will trigger predictable and possible reactions on the part of various demographics as he sets them up for even more future planned events for those future reactions to guide people toward a great awakening.

 

Trump holding up the bible could mean several things and accomplish several goals. You're assuming it means one thing, and you're creating an entire, warped perception of reality based on it.

 

Go ahead and explain why it means what you think it means, and we'll see if it holds up to scrutiny. The claim that you're testifying is not proof by the way.

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 11:38 p.m. No.21217311   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7335

>>21217303

Nigger, I'm a retard talking to a mentally ill person that is you. I'm trying to figure out what's going on, and I'd like to be able to talk to anons without having to deal with your nuisance ass. I will feel bad later for being mean to you, but I've been seeing your posts for a while now, and it's finally gotten to me.

 

You think your posts potentially save lives. What if they are killing people or driving them away?

You say you are talking to quiet readers when you give people (you)s. That's not how this board is supposed to work as far as I understand. If you reply to someone, you don't talk like a fucking maniac to imaginary people. I will reply in some form or fashion if I'm addressed, but you have no plan for this other than to be even more ridiculous as the post count grows.

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 11:44 p.m. No.21217329   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7355

>>21217320

How does you being a chooser help me see that Trump raising the bible means what you say it means? Ok, you claim you are a chooser. I still don't see how that makes sense for Trump's bible raising to mean what you say it means about the hand of God.

Unless you want to somehow have your wife appear in this bread with confirmation that you two are married, that is still only one witness which doesn't actually prove anything, and it won't help me suddenly see or understand what it is you're saying.

So maybe you have some other way to explain it beyond claiming to be a chooser?

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 15, 2024, 11:52 p.m. No.21217344   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7365

>>21217335

>You get off on name calling, twisting things, and pretending like you have some type of powers of perception.

You are projecting. You're the one claiming how to interpret certain things like Trump holding up a bible, and your justification for that interpretation is that you are a chooser and can testify. Therefore, you're the one with some sort of power of perception, and you're the one twisting things because you haven't been able to explain it to where I can see what you see and just keep changing the subject or deflecting.

>So what is your theory and thesis,

Asking this question doesn't confirm your own.

>please give us your discourse that we may become as wise as you

This is condescension.

>that the world might be saved, that it should not perish.

This is patronizing.

 

Waitโ€ฆ I got those green texts from a previous message of yours. Your new one is a copy/paste but not the full thing.

>You get off on name calling, twisting things, and pretending like you have some type of powers of perception. So what is your theory and thesis, please give us your discourse that we may become as

So I'm talking to a bot thenโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 16, 2024, 12:03 a.m. No.21217377   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7402

>>21217357

But you're not.

Anon asks you what your thoughts are on foreskins because you're preaching to him for reasons he doesn't understand, and your reply is illogical. When I questioned you about your intended meaning, you said you don't even talk to the people you're giving (you)s to. You're talking to imaginary lurkers. That to me is easily considered insane behavior. Now you change your tune and say you ARE talking to me, but you're also talking to lurkers. This is still insane to me, and I still don't understand what the fuck you're saying much of the time.

 

>>21217355

>So then why would Trump do that and knowing the press have a field day?

Ok, if that's your question, then stop there unless you can actually come up with a rational explanation.

>Because he understood the importance of recognizing God's hand in this battle for all of us,

This is not rational. This is you presuming what it is Trump is understanding based on the assumption that he did it to save lives, and your reasoning for this is that you've thought about it. That's not at all logical. Nobody can follow this. Georgia Guidestones should in all likelihood be irrelevant to the question you're asking unless there is some rational connection to these events which you've yet to explain beyond your assumption that the destruction of the guidestones was a miracle which I and likely many others have no reason to believe it was a miracle at all. Even if you can prove that it was, that still doesn't answer your initial question as to why Trump held up the bible.

Anonymous ID: 58b27d July 16, 2024, 12:17 a.m. No.21217417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7464

>>21217402

You being around since day 1 does not mean you decoded the event with Trump holding up the bible properly.

Why would I ask Trump the answer to your question?

That is projection again. I'm doubting or unable to understand your answer to your own question, and you're suggesting to yourself (at me) to ask Trump what the real answer is that you could share with anons in a way that anons will understand.

 

I don't want to harp. You're saying things that don't make sense, and you can't explain yourself. The guidestones could have been demolished, not destroyed by God via miracle. Everybody hates the George Guidestones.

 

>>21217415

If your ideas don't hold up to scrutiny, how are they still valid unless you are insane?