Anonymous ID: 693bf1 Jan. 30, 2018, 11:03 a.m. No.212701   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>212408

Assuming it is cabal controlled, this likely comes out of a think tank somewhere. The writers at Gannet would just be preparing the digestible talking points and stories for the news outlets. The strategy would be done elsewhere, IMO, unless that's integrated into Gannet.

Anonymous ID: 693bf1 Jan. 30, 2018, 11:07 a.m. No.212731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2737

>>212447

It said 50,000 images. It did not say that all 50,000 were of child pornography. It is much more likely there were many kiddie-porn pictures, but most were probably just porn.

Anonymous ID: 693bf1 Jan. 30, 2018, 11:12 a.m. No.212767   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2880

>>212499

I find it highly unlikely there are 50K CP images. The statement read 50,000 images - did not specifically cite 50K child porn images. Much more likely there were CP images mixed in with porn images.

Anonymous ID: 693bf1 Jan. 30, 2018, 11:34 a.m. No.212938   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2947

>>212737

False. Being in possession of child pornography is a federal crime. If the perp is in the pictures, it is evidence of child rape in addition to child porn.