It also forces the question anon has been asking "why would the rifle be that far away"?
Shooter was right handed. Not likely (at all) for the rifle to fly that far from shooter without something propelling it.
It also forces the question anon has been asking "why would the rifle be that far away"?
Shooter was right handed. Not likely (at all) for the rifle to fly that far from shooter without something propelling it.
Anon knows its complete bs. There'd be drone footage ongoing, the CNN photog taking pics at 1/8000 and 'happens' to get trail of bullet, and so on.
At some point we all will recognize we are the ants and they are the grasshoppers
Its believable w/FPS of the camera, but not believable that the phtog would be shooting at that FPS typically. Positioned perfectly. Taking an abundance of shots at that specific time. Smells to this anon.
Oh anon gets that was the desired result they were going for. The phtographer should be snatched up but can't trust the fedbois (any) to actually do their jobs….they seem to be too busy here pushing their bs.
We see you!
would say thats an option IF there were bodies in view of the drone but there were none. There's also no blood pool in the area according to the image