>>225731
>graph will never show shadow banning sadly. There is honestly no way of really knowing.
>i mean look at http :// tweeplers.com/hashtags/?cc=US
>and you'll see MAGA and Release the memo high up on numbers. But on twatter it doesn't show them anywhere.
>This is why i assume we might need a different tactic than just creating a new hash everytime a event (that we want to push) comes up.
>You can shadow ban hashes and users. We know that much. Right?
>YOu can always make a new account. But the a-typical trending hashes? Cant really ban those. Not at all.
>So heres an idea
>We wait a week, and look up the normal trending hashes that always occur on those days (WednesdayWisdom eg,)
>We Use those hashes to push out our redpill information.
>At the same time. We keep push the normal ones (Ice cream ones) But keep them seperated completely.
>So One tweet maybe goes "#ObamaGate sure #Sucks ! I would #love some justice to be had! #Maga!!"
>The other one is " #(The one that is used that day, #WednesdayWisdom as an example) #WednesdayWisdom Did you know, that %%Information%%"
>Could something like that work? We're covering two sides of a coin, trying to stay out of the "This looks like botting" area and still dispensing redpills?
>I am just worried that Twatter is on the warpath when it comes to hiding whats actually trending and whats not.
we will consider, TY