tyb
always on top of things, pig.
noticed they are using "reset" and "unity" a lot. think it is a strong mk word to induce the memory hole / sleep. the assassination fail might just be the thing which breaks the spell… we'll see.
also noticed that POTUS is co-opting "unity" from them, like he co-opted "fake news" and shoved it up their ass. unity will now mean unify behind POTUS / get on the Trump train, bitches.
he's a master at it.
Res Ipsa Loquitur / Ipse Dixit
Two somewhat complementary principles in common law that are very relevant to the assassination attempt. Because of their long lineage, they point to core and accepted principles that, if pushed, can lead to changing perspectives on the attempted assassination.
Res ipsa loquitur means "the thing speaks for itself". A prosecutor can meet his initial burden of proof by the very circumstances of the situation, and doesn't need to offer separate proof. Here, the crime is attempted assassination (or attempted treason, really). The charge is that the fifth column in the US attempted the assassination of a presidential candidate. The circumstances are keystone-cops-level of fuckups by DHS/SS.
Why is this important?
Because the media, who is complicit, continues to block assertions that this may have been a plot or an intentional act by a group (the fifth column in our agencies). And "serious" folks in the media and in society who may not be intentionally blocking, are nevertheless victims of propaganda and normalcy bias in a way that reflexively causes them to block anyone asserting that the attempt could be an attempted coup by the fifth column.
If people begin to simply assert that there was an attempted coup by the fifth column, or an attempted assassination plot by the fifth column, we can begin to change perspectives by simply saying that it speaks for itself, when challenged.
Ipse Dixit means "he said it himself" - i.e., he has no basis. When the media says there is "no evidence", they are simply stating it without a basis. There is tons of circumstantial evidence! It speaks for itself (res ipsa loquitur).
So, when they ask, what evidence do you have? or, when they say that there is "no evidence", the easiest and best reply is simply to say - "what is YOUR basis for saying there is no evidence" or "what is your basis for saying it was NOT a planned coup attempt by the deep state?" and follow with "it speaks for itself!"
turn the tables. always turn the tables on this one. gotta break the programming on this one.
Tldr - what is my basis? No - what is YOUR basis?
breads are flyin
it is a doctrine used to satisfy initial burden… causes burden to shift w/ no other evidence than the thing itself (here, keystone cops level of fuckups).
using it for the principle - to put the burden on the media and DHS to state their basis, offer their proofs, and refuse to take their insistence that we need to prove an inside job. there is more than enough proof to make the buden be on them to deny it with proof of their own. don't take a shoulder shrug, or "oh well, we'll never know"…. assume the fact and move on. turn the table.