>>21245293 (lb)

>Why do they always have to tell people that they are Jewish after they bash White People?

It's a shield, Anon. Being "Jewish" (tm) has perks. You're above contestation for any type of behavior due to muh "anti-Semitisms" (tm). If that doesn't work, you can invoke muh "Lolocaust" (tm) and muh "6 gorillion" (tm). But you'll never see the Jewish community calling out these "individual Jews" (tm) and if (you) do it, the Jewish community, will attack you en masse for "anti-Semitisms" (tm). We're slaves to Jewish rule, due to rhetoric. All animals are equal, Anon, but some aremore equalthan others.

They attack me, 'cos I just want a level playing field foreveryone.

https://jewishjournal.com/cover_story/295918/were-jews-were-not-white-we-define-ourselves/

>>21245316

>The Timeline has changed

My thoughts too. The shot at Trump was where all the timeline's merged. We're on a single thread now. Of course, that's assuming time is actually interpreted the way are low-IQ minds, as a species, perceive it.

>>21245438

>but the Christian God is not the same as the jewish God, is it?

It's all the same lie, Anon. All the religions. Same story told from different context, due to locale.

>>21245341

Kek. I'm waiting for this fag to kiss his biceps and flex when he makes a video.

>>21245519

Kek. Oy vey, Anon! You're not allowed to talk like that here.

>>21245531

Liberalism created the incel faggots like Fuentes and now women are mad that soyboys checked out? Fucking KEK!

>>21245575

>the jews are Satanists/Lucifarians, but (you) already know this, don't (you)?

Theyreallywant to tie the Cabal to muh "Christianity" (tm) don't they? I'm not even Christian, but I can see they want Christians to be the bad guys in the story.

>>21245583

>Wong

Forgot something there.

>>21245618

Not everyone is religious, Anon. There seems to be a communication problem conveying this to religious types.

>>21245691

Kek. I thought that said "Pilpul."

>>21245698

Always the "or else."

>>21245723

>anon didn't see any "or else."

No, you just posted a meme that says "wrong" responding to a snip of my own which said verbatim in toto, "Not everyone is religious, Anon. There seems to be a communication problem conveying this to religious types." Then, you follow up with your own comment which was and again, I'm quoting you verbatim in toto, "…you're gonna have to serve somebody…" You're welcome to believe whatever you want, Anon. That'syourfucking business. You don't get to project your religious ideology upon others, without protest, hence my comment about "communication problems" with religious types, specifically the Abrahamic ones.

> it's not a choice,

Yes, it is. It's called muh "Free will" (tm). I have a choice tonotbelieve and if I don't then it's not a choice, it's anultimatium.