>>21249159 (pb)

John is a saint.

he wrote that.

but you don't trust saints,won't talk to them in prayer and ask their intercession to plead to Jesus and the Father almighty.

but yet you quote his writings.

that's odd to me, anon.

like you have cognitive dissonance.

John either is or isn't in Heaven. If he's in Heaven you can ask him to intercede for you to Jesus.

but instead you accuse me of being bad because I know that I can by quoting him who you won't even pray to . . .

very strange.

but I know, you are a protestant, probaby a free mason, and you've been mislead and lied to by your lodge superiors.

>>21249199

it would be nice if in her honor we did away with the Juneteenth holiday, as it's used to divide and provide 'you were slaves' talking points.

the Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday is enough to celebrate Black America, because King was about unity.

>>21249237

Catholics have more prayers than you are aware of, and this thing called 'The Devine Office' which you probably have never heard of. And of course they pray to Jesus, The Father, and to the Holy Spirit.

but they also respect and pray for the dead.

and pray to Saints for intercession to plead our case to God Almighty.

>>21249239

so which saint are you quoting when you talk about this? Mathew, Mark, Luke, or John?

what is your point anon? accusing me of what by asking this rediculous question.

If you trust the writers of the Gospels to quote Jesus correctly, why do you ignore that you can talk to those saints yourself?

>>21249233

why don't you quote Jesus's writings?

Oh, the only thing we know he wrote was in the dust when the jerks wanted to stone the fallen woman. And we don't know what that was.

>>21249250

you only know about Jesus because the holy Apostle passed down the tradition.

you quote their writings but you deny that they are important souls in heaven, sitting to judge the twelve tribes of Israel.

you quote them to put down Christians who actually have a more advanced understanding of scripture but meanwhile you trash them and say you wouldn't bother talking to them and asking them to intercede for you, even though 15 hundred years of tradition showed that praying to saints results in miracles.

>>21249295

excuse me almost 2000 years of tradition shows us that praying for the intercession of saints often provides miracles!

>>21249305

you know that you are just doing this because your tradition of free masonry shows that this is a way to torment Catholics most of whom are put off by your pigheadedness.

>>21249318

no, anon, you have die and then you become a saint.

Now you're quoting St Paul

but he's not Jesus. why don't you quote Jesus?

oh, ya, because we only know what he said because the holy saints told us what he said.

you trust that they told us truthfully what he said but you don't trust that you can talk to them directly.

so when you get to heaven, you gonna just give them the cold shoulder?

>>21249290

telling me what I believe now?

wow.

>>21249347

who are you, IP hopper?

afraid of what question?

I wasn't speaking to you.

>>21249362

why didn't you type 'nunt-ahh'

if you're going to do this bit now.

my point: protestants use the talking point that people shouldn't worship saints and Mary to antagonize Catholics not because they want a discussion but merely because they want to antagonize Catholics.

they ignore that there is a brotherhood of Christians and tell Catholics that they are sinners for doing what tradition has proven works: praying for the intercession of angels and saint to interced for us to the Lord our God.

and when they do this bit, becuase it's a bit, they forget that Catholics are Christians and forget that the body of Christ includes Catholics (and also other followers of Christ).

and that is what they do.

but they can only perform this badger by quoting the very saints to whom they give the silent treatment.

it's ironic.

and it rather shows how foolish the talking point is that you can't pray for the intercession of saints when you can, and it works, and people do.

the only reason you make the argument is just to antagnoize fellow Christians.

that seems rather un Christian to me and not what Jesus taught us to do.

>>21249396

>>21249393

both of you are just doing a bit.

it's a bit designed to atagonize Catholics.

there is a Body of Christ.

It includes Catholics

but your bit is just to atagonize Catholics.

that's why I know that you're not sincere.

my answer you inquisition isn't going to change you mind. you don't care to understand how absurd it is that you give Mary, the Angels, and the Saints a silent treatment, and yet quote saints to make your arguments.

you either believe or do not believe in the body of Christ. And if you don't then you don't include that Saints are part of that.

so you trash them. But then you quote them

it's ridiculous for me to continue trying to show you why you are wrong because you're minds are closed to the idea of actually caring for your fellows if they are not part of whatever culty protestant sect you adhere to, if you even are a Christian at all ,or just someone doing a bit to annoy Catholics.

by their fruits you will know them and you are only doing the antagonize bit so I think that is rather a rotten fruit.

good bye.

>>21249432

more pretending to be an inquisitor and not respecting the traditions of others, but just antagonizing them and calling them sinners for doing what they know is correct.

>>21249437

more anti Catholic talking points.

you guys don't respect Catholics and just want to antagonize them.

if you want to know the answers to the questions you ask, but you don't, I suggest you pick up and study the Cathacism of the Catholic Church, in which you can find the answers.

but you really don't care. you're happy in your apostate ignorance claiming you have the 'word of God' but not really bothering to study it, or to study the tradition of it that goes back almost 2000 years. In your mind you throw away anything that anyone learned or thought between the time of John on Patmos and when Martin Luther decided to condemn Rome because he didn't like the politics, and then Rome was sacked a little while later (1527).

you probably don't even know that.

no, anon, you are illogical.

you ignore the power of Saints to intercede, and yet use their words (The New Testiment) to justify it. But you can't really know it because you ignore 15 hundred years of commentary of insight and inspiration of the Holy Spirit (Charisms).

so there you are throwing stones at Catholics and condemning them all for merely doing what they know is correct.

what would Jesus write in the dust about your sins, anon?

>>21249471

you recite talking points and ignore the Truth of the Body of Christ and the power of Saints to intercede for us.

and yet you get the bible because it was written by the very saints who you give the silent treatment.

when you get to heaven are you only going to talk to Jesus and no one else?

>>21249512

It was not a South American nun, but a sister from Italy.

>>21249347

note that it's a team of them.

they pretend to be all about the Bible, but really they are just about giving someone a hard time.

they tell you 'so you blah blah blah' just making it up.

they never admit how absurd it is that they quote the scriptures written by the people who they give the silent treatment.

>>21249544

you seem as a hateful troll, anon, who doesn't care about Christianity, but just to make others feel badly about their views.

you have no point other than to cause distress in faithful people.

>>21249572

now it pretends I am playing.

no, I'm telling you that your hateful troll bit is a hateful troll bit.

you don't harm me, but you harm yourself.

you are here to cause grief and pain to faithful people, but really we know you're just doing a bit so it's only yourself who you harm.