>>2124985
By virtue of the repeal of that Act, which institution controls the propaganda that is used against the American people? An institution that Trump controls? So, why can't he literally flick a switch and it stops?>>2124993
>First you let your enemy show you their true colors. If your paying attention you will see the media has less and less trust. People are becoming numb to their message.
This sounds like a reasonable approach if you are fighting from a position of weakness, but why would this be necessary when you actually have control over the problem? Your statement:
>You are mistaken if you do not believe we already control the media.
So if I'm following this correctly, we need to allow an institution that we control to continue to do things that we don't like (even though we can stop it) so that we can eventually get into the position to stop it? And meanwhile the effects of allowing it to continue as such as negative and counter-effective to our ultimate aims? Continue to allow them to try to win votes in the next election? Continue to allow them to portray Trump putting kids in cages? Continue to allow them to portray Patriots as bigots? All because we supposedly must let them so that we can eventually stop them even though we acutally already control them and can stop them now?
WHAT THE FUCK?