Anonymous ID: b20e1c July 20, 2024, 12:31 a.m. No.21250441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0449 >>0456 >>0471 >>0479 >>0771

You anons can toss this thing around until the cows come home. Seen enough. Made up my mind. Don't care about firing angles, hosing down the roof, water tank, water tower, forklift. None of it. Trump is alive and will be alright. Just a few facts matter to this anon.

 

  1. The NY Post posted a story saying the shooter was Chinese right after the shooting and it stayed up for one hour and twenty minutes. In that period it was archived on the wayback machine at least 6 times. This was not a story about a cat in a tree. This was a story about a presidential assassination. I'm not using the word attempted because, at the time, no one knew with any certainty if it would turn out to be successful or not. No. Not a story to be published with reckless disregard. If they posted that the shooter was Chinese then they truly believed that they had that fact correctly reported. Whoever their source was, they trusted them. Or they would not have published information that is so volatile. Anon has no doubt that during that hour and twenty minutes crimes were committed against Asian people as a result. Of course the story was pulled.

 

  1. When the Secret Service made a statement so ridiculous as to say that the problem was the "slope" of the roof, that is a huge marker to draw attention to that statement. They knew it when they said it. It screams look at me, look at me. On purpose. Slope is a rather non-delicate way of saying Asian person. And it is a perfect code word because it is so politically incorrect as to automatically self destruct every single time it is transmitted. Which gives it built in plausible deniability as well as added distraction value. In the world of high stakes political propaganda, this is elegant camouflage.

 

  1. The confusion around the shooter's identity (Crooks or Yearick) is designed, perhaps not as well as it could have been, to draw attention back to the question of the identity of the shooter. In fact, the meanings of the words in their full names can conjure certain ways of thinking about the incident.

 

  1. Finally settling on Crooks and announcing him as the shooter with photo. He looks like Elizabeth Warren. Rather the person they fabricated looks like her. Unlike the Maine bowling alley shooter, they don't use the US military to give a supporting back story to their creation. Instead they use Blackrock, which is probably just about as easy to do. And quite possibly even a smaller circle of people, likely three letter individuals in suits instead of uniforms, had to have knowledge of it to pull it off. Lid down. Message delivered. Still wondering why Elizabeth Warren? Because she is not an American Indian. Just like the shooter is not a Caucasian. Just Asian.

 

I'm done. Moving on. God Bless President Trump. Ya'll have all the fun and confusion you want with it from here on out. I'll be looking at other stuff.