"TOO WISE"
Matthew Bracken
@Matt_Bracken
1h
·
·
Douglas Macgregor
@DougAMacgregor
The government narrative of the assassination attempt has more holes in it than a slice of Swiss cheese.
Flooding the internet with unconfirmed reports is made worse by “political scare porn” from across the political spectrum: “There were two shooters!” “There were three shooters!”
If this confusion persists in the absence of any authoritative assessment we will soon hear the old Washington formulation, “mistakes were made, and let’s move on.”
This response won’t work. It’s time for the truth from the Biden Administration regardless of how ugly it may be.
https://gab.com/Matt_Bracken/posts/112819539310058380
https://thehill.com/homenews/race-politics/4780486-black-women-biden-harris-letter/
Matthew Bracken
@Matt_Bracken
4h
·
·
·
Edited
Anybody pushing the water tower sniper theory is wrong, IMHO. Only a suicide sniper with no intention of escaping would use that water tower. It would be too easy for witnesses to hear and then to see him, and then for LE who are not part of a conspiracy to cut him off from escape.
"Ear witnesses" are frequently wrong based on their confusion of muzzle blasts, sonic cracks and echoes.
Harken back to the Mohammed and Malvo snipers, and the "a white man in a white van" false lead. "Ear witnesses" frequently pointed in the direction of echoes and sonic cracks, and not to the sedan where the shots originated from under 200 yards away from their victims. (Similar to the Butler PA rifle distance.)
Ditto visual glitches showing up on videos that can be misinterpreted as anything. I've seen photos and videos of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster that are much more convincing than "a sniper moving on the water tower."
If there was a 2nd or 3rd sniper, meaning a broader conspiracy to assassinate Trump, escaping unseen would be their paramount, even the only concern. The entire point of a 2nd sniper would be to leave Crooks as the sole person (aka the patsy) responsible for shooting Trump. I'm not ruling out a 2nd sniper, but anybody pushing the water tower sniper theory is wrong, IMHO, and I automatically discount everything else they say about the case.
PS: "Patsy" does not mean the person didn't fire a weapon, or even that he did not make the kill shot. It only means he is being painted as the "lone gunman" to close off discussion of a wider conspiracy. Oswald might have taken shots from the Dallas Book Depository window, and still be a patsy, (as he claimed on television before he was killed and permanently silenced by Jack Ruby).
https://gab.com/Matt_Bracken/posts/112818823048064424
Matthew Bracken
@Matt_Bracken
5h
·
·
PLEASE STUDY and share this list of very basic yet critical unanswered questions.
by Sean Davis @seanmdav
Here’s an abbreviated list of extremely basic factual questions about the Trump assassination attempt that for some reason haven’t been definitively answered (anonymous leaks don’t count):
1) What make, model, and caliber of firearm was used, and when/where/by whom was it purchased?
2) What make and model of ammo was used (including the weight of the bullet used)?
3) Did the rifle used have any type of magnified optic or red dot sight on it, and if so, what make/model, and what exact setting was the optic on when the shooter used it?
4) Have authorities put identical rounds through the rifle with the identical optics settings and confirmed both the zero and the result of shots fired at the range at which they were fired on Saturday?
5) How many shell casings were recovered from the crime scene? How many remaining rounds were in the magazine that was found in the rifle?
6) How many rounds were fired by the shooter on the warehouse rooftop? Has each round been accounted for (i.e., do investigators know where each round landed, and does the number of bullets found or accounted for match the number of shell casings found?
7) Have investigators confirmed, via the recovered bullets and the known trajectory of the bullets, that the shooter on the rooftop fired each one?
8) Have investigators reconstructed the shooter’s precise movements over the past days, weeks, and months? If so, have they put together a list of every person with whom he interacted over that time period, but in person and virtually or online?
9) Have investigators reviewed video surveillance of the shooter at all various locations he recently visited (e.g., gun range, gun dealer, restaurants, traffic cameras, etc.)? If so, have they canvassed and interviewed each person seen with the shooter?
These aren’t difficult questions to answer. These are usually the types of details promptly provided by authorities in the days following shocking, violent events of national importance.
Yet we do not have a single one of these questions definitely answered on the record by an official authority. Not one.
Why the heck not?
11:16 PM · Jul 19, 2024
https://gab.com/Matt_Bracken/posts/112818749930181625