Almost unrecognizable, this is Sharon Stone threatening to move to Europe when Trump wins.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1814896285935079783
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/sharon-stone-trump-empathy-childhood-trauma-b433820.html
Sharon Stone has said she has “empathy” for Trump, stating that she thinks “he’s had some childhood trauma”.
When asked about her views on the controversial president, the Basic Instinct star divulged, “Actually, I have empathy for him because it’s heartbreaking to watch.”
Stone told The Telegraph, “I think he’s had some childhood trauma. I look at this man and it feels to me like whatever his traumas are, he is torturing and hurting himself.”
The 62-year-old went on to say the same might be true of Trump’s voting base too, “It’s affecting so many people that are coming out in support [of] him, with Nazi masks and all that stuff.
“Those are also people who have a heartbreaking level of internal rage, and that rage comes from feeling so insecure and so hurt.”
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1814897041111162958
brutal
David Attenborough narrates this Biden Kamala drama.
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1814845906597913018
Grok says the Photographer who took the Bullet Shot that went past Trumps head has NEVER been to a Trump rally until July 13, 2024…
Oh boy…. I hope Grok is wrong…
This can’t be right, can it?
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1813959630193664217
Everyone should read this…
🚨 The NYT Reporter who Captured the Bullet Flying Past Trumps Head, was using the Kind of Camera & Settings you’d Use to Capture Live-Fire Action, Such as a Head Exploding!
@Michael_Yon
, one of the most experienced combat war correspondents living today, made a Compelling assessment.
I put together his assessment in a more understandable breakdown, provided additional details, and my analysis.
đź”´ Quoted from the NYT
• Who was the Photographer?
—— A famous veteran NYT photographer named Doug Mills.
• What Kind of Equipment & Settings were used?
—— Mr. Mills was using a Sony A1 and 24mm f/1.4 GM, capable of capturing images at up to 30 frames per second. Priced at $6,499.
—— He took these photos with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second. Extremely Fast by industry standards.
The above is quoted from NYT themselves.
Source: (https://nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/photo-path-trump-assassination.html)
🔴 The Perfect “Shot”
• If the gunman was firing an AR-15-style rifle, the .223-caliber or 5.56-millimeter bullets they use travel at roughly 3,200 feet per second when they leave the weapon’s muzzle.
—— “And with a 1/8,000th of a second shutter speed, this would allow the bullet to travel approximately four-tenths of a foot while the shutter is open.”
• Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one in a million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming.
At that distance and trajectory, had any bullet hit Trump, that type of camera and settings would have easily captured his head frankly exploding.
Were they there for the “Perfect Pulitzer Prize Head Shot”…?
đź”´ COUNTER ARGUMENTS
• “Some journalists argue Its usage by the NYT photographers is not unusual.”
—— Only professional photographers can answer this question.
• “Shooting at 1/8000 at f1.6 in daylight is also not unusual, but necessary for proper exposure.”
—— again, only Professional and unbiased photographers can answer that question.
đź”´ CRITICAL QUESTIONS THAT WILL EITHER PROVE OR DEBUNK THIS
• Examine any and all Video footage of the Photographer, Doug Mills, at least 1-2 minutes before the shot.
—— check body language.
—— how many images did he capture leading up to THAT moment?
—— was he ultra focused in the moments leading up to the shots?
• How many times has Doug Mills photographed at a Trump rally?
—— apply that same question to other cameramen & photographers.
• Who made the decision to send Doug Mills there?
—— climb the ladder.
• How common is it for these kinds of cameras and these settings used to capture rally speeches, where the “object” being photographed is standing still?
—— Trump campaign photographers can weigh in easily on this, or maybe even Gene Ho.
• Why were all legacy media outlets showing THIS rally Live?
—— they rarely do that…
—— CNN, MSNBC, FOX, and others decided to show THIS rally?
—— Find out who gave those outlets the green light to show this rally live. Climb the ladder.
These questions can lead the Trump campaign to answers.
Yes, But…
Regardless, the role of the VP includes
ATTACK DOG
tora tora tora
attack attack attack
Michael Yon twxxt
https://x.com/Michael_Yon/status/1813286486198132813
Bullet Trace, and interesting matters
It’s nearly 0400 here in Japan. So this is a mind-dump, sans edit:
Interesting on bullet trace — scratching my memories, I do not recall seeing any bullet trace photos from close to 90 degrees from bullet’s flight path. Am not saying it cannot be done. It probably can be done with modern cameras and high shutter speeds.
Now keep in mind I am pretty handy with weapons and with cameras. I was a Special Forces weapons specialist. As a photographer, I shot some of the most famous photos in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Substantial crossover knowledge.
My first thought was — I’d never seen a trace shot from that angle. Second thought was it should be possible. Third thought was that would be a fast shutter speed.
I was preparing to reach out to the photographer. Hunting and pecking online, I found New York Times quoting the shutter speed at 1/8000th of second.
It happens that I have sitting on table here the top three DSLRs Sony makes. The cameras most people salivate over, I have three here. Because I know how important serious gear is.
I use only the very best cameras and lenses. Top gear helped make some of the most interesting and often intense photos in two wars. Unfortunately I often broke lenses while jumping on the ground or hitting against a wall or doorway. No camera ever broke.
I use the cameras regularly though rarely publish photos from them these days. The maximum shutter speed on all three of these cameras in 1/8000.
The the New York Times photographer, Doug Mills, is quoted as shooting at 30fps 1/8000.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1814849996715332024
https://x.com/catturd2/status/1814621272766099749
She deleted her account - lol.
https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/1814443305243177158NEW: Former CIA analyst Gail Helt suggests that Donald Trump orchestrated his own assassination attempt.
Helt, who worked for the agency for over a decade, claimed that Trump staged the failed attempt because he is "desperate to stay out of prison."
Following her comment, Helt made her account private.
If she proposes her conspiracy theory, mine is somewhat different; I would posit that the CIA orchestrated the attempt on Trump's life.
Remember when the Germans laughed at Trump when he warned them about being dependent on Russian energy?
12:33 AM · Jul 20, 2024
·
https://x.com/feelsdesperate/status/1814519031212183920
Democracy Really Is Dying in Darkness—But by Whom?
Never in modern presidential history has a political party staged a veritable inside coup to remove their current president from his ongoing candidacy for his party’s nomination and reelection.
Stranger still, the very elites and grandees, who now are using every imaginable means of deposing Biden as their nominee, are the very public voices that just weeks ago insisted that candidate Biden was “sharp as a tack” and “fit as a fiddle.” And they damned any who thought otherwise!
They are also the identical operators whose machinations ensured that there would not be an open Democratic primary. They demonized the few on the Left who weakly challenged Biden in the primaries. Yet now they will select a replacement candidate who likely never received a single primary vote.
Note further: Biden’s impending forced abdication is not because he is non compos mentis.
Rather, the inside move is due to Biden’s disastrous debate exposure that confirmed his dementia could no longer be disguised by a conspiracy of leftist politicos and media.
But far more importantly, the impetus for removal is driven by the admission that the cognitively Biden is headed for a climactic November defeat.
Were Biden now ahead in the polls by five points, these same backroom machinists would be insisting that he was still Pericles.
Yet now Biden is being un-personed and Trotskyized, as we prepare the new groupthink narrative of his likely surrogate—a soon to be praised eloquent, mellifluous, and articulate Cicero-Harris.
That Biden will likely remain as president until January 20, 2025, should remind the country the Left is more worried about its own next four-year continuance in power than the fate of the country that now admittedly will be guided in the next six months by a president judged unfit by his own supporters to run for the very office that he will still keep holding.
Further irony arises when those who, as supposedly guardians of democratic norms, pontificated to the country the last nine years about the Trump-Hitlerian threat to democracy. Yet now they so cavalierly work overtime on how:
a) to pull off the removal of their candidate from the November ballot on grounds of senility,
b) but not the removal of the same president from office (their own fate is more precious than our collective fate as a nation),
c) while trying to select, rather than elect, a replace candidate,
d) without ever offering any explanation, much less an apology, how a Democrat president from January 20, 2021, was daily declared vibrant, dynamic, and engaged but suddenly one day after June 27, 2024, was remanufactured as not?
Perhaps as an aid and primer on Biden removal they should reread the essay by former Obama Pentagon official Rosa Books. Just 11 days after the Trump inauguration, she published in Foreign Policy, “3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020”.
It was a veritable manual on the various ways of removing the just inaugurated president—listing immediate alternatives to the distant 2020 election: impeachment and conviction, 25th-Amendment removal, and, barring all that, a military coup: “The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.”
So, to make sense of what these self-appointed and sanctimonious protectors of democracy are trying to pull off demands an Orwellian vocabulary—memory hole, newspeak, unperson, and groupthink.
Yet there is one more irony.
Very soon, those who welcomed the protests of summer 2020 radicals, and exempted the rioting and violence, and then again did nothing in 2024 as mobs tore apart campuses and shut down public facilities, will host a Chicago convention—where those very same liberated forces may wreak havoc on the outside, while their backroom progenitors, with threats, money, and the media, will wreak havoc on democracy on the inside.
Last edited
5:56 AM · Jul 19, 2024
https://x.com/VDHanson/status/1814237816936673464