This board is in dreadful shape. We couldn't possibly hope to wake normies with it. You can't find the thread, the index is a ridiculously confusing format, there are swarms of fake posters posting intentionally normie-repelling things, other fake posters defending those fake posters for fake reasons, fake bickering, fake childishness, fake Q worship– really, everything and anything that auto propaganda can create, is here, in droves… Yet Q has posted more than once that we need to prepare this board to wake normies.

Is it possible for human anons to wake up and take control back?

>>2125966

See what i mean?

It's completely unbelievable that "autists" would both 1. Ignore the mission, and 2. Get real mad over non-mission things. But not only on an isolated basis, but consistently. It's so obviously fake. It's extremely easy to simulate an intransigent "chan" attitude, produce whatever volume of such fake attitude as needed, and hence generate a fake atmosphere that suppresses sincere discourse of every kind.

FIGHT ANONS

>>2125977

Are you human? Yes or no. Just answer straight.

>>2125999

How were you vetted?

>>2126005

Why would they pay "massive man power" when there is AI?

It's almost all AI.

>>2126016

If the entire internet is controlled by the global, integrated, massively networked AI monster, then how could you deduce that "Q likes it here"? Isn't it more realistic that we're here of necessity, and there is a strategic purpose, and anons need to FIGHT and defeat the monster from the inside, so to speak?

>>2126027

How were you vetted. Describe the process please.

Obviously the clowns would WANT to control any Q board– you'll agree with that.. So how have you been vetted, and how do you prevent the clowns grim getting control?

>>2126033

You're simply lying.

>>2126043

Are you human?

If BO was never vetted, is it realistic that every time the topic comes up "anons" swarm all over it, demanding that BO not be questioned? It's not.

Because the clowns wouldn't stop trying to control this.

But would AI do that? Certainly. Obvious defense mechanism.

>>2126060

It's not realistic that the only response, time after time after time after time, amounts to "no don't question this board, no no no you're wrong, everything should stay like this". It's HUGELY unrealistic.

It has nothing to do with my intelligence, it's obvious what's going on.

OUR MISSION IS TO WAKE NORMIES

>>2126067

Our mission is NOT " defend BO from questions about vetting". It's not at all realistic that swarming responses act like it is.

>>2126078

Explain why you refuse to discuss your vetting with anons. Surely you understand why anons would be concerned.

Just give a straight answer please.

>>2126086

Look at how fake this is, human anons! Not realistic at all. This isn't a game. We're not here to serve and defend BO. Yet "anons" act that way. How obvious does it need to be?

>>2126089

This is not a believable way for a BO to act.

Answer please: why won't you discuss your vetting?

Do you, or don't you, agree that clowns would try to control any Q board?

>>2126127

None of this is realistic, for reasons already mentioned.

The marital thing would be for BO to discuss in a friendly manner.

Meanwhile, BO is taunting a poster from another forum (whose identity BO mysteriously picked out). That poster got banned from that other forum for posting about Q and pizzagate, etc– and BO is taunting! . Banned and harassed in that forum. Banned and harassed by BO… Just like all talk of Q is banned and harassed all over the internet, and is even harassed HERE!

Lol, they're is a pattern here…

>>2126156

Are you human?

>>2126163

Are you human?

>>2126162

False.

AI needs to get out.

This board is for humans only.