Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 3:11 a.m. No.21274015   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4027

>>21274011

Kek, you're again asking anon to label patterns as famefag.

The path towards knowledge in this instance is considering all the patterns you as the 'famwfag' labeller are not labelling as such.

You only label some patterns as 'famefag' while all other patterns are not so labelled.

Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 3:14 a.m. No.21274026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4250 >>4530 >>4681 >>4734

Party pushing Cornel West for president sues North Carolina elections board

 

Specifically mentioned within the lawsuit are Democratic Party operativesโ€™ interference with Justice for Allโ€™s petition drive, and Clear Choice Action represented by the Elias Law Group. Marc Elias, the 2021 founder, has long been a leading counsel for Democrats on campaign finance, voting rights, redistricting and general election litigation.

 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/party-pushing-cornel-west-president-sues-north-carolina-elections-board

Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 3:26 a.m. No.21274052   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4064

>>21274027

>You didn't answer the question

Anon did answer the question. The answer is all the patterns you're not labelling "famefag".

"Which ones? Name just one" would again be a request for anon to engage in famefag labelling, which anon won't do.

So, anon answers the question by referencing all the patterns you're not labelling as "famefag" as the answer to your queation.

Not asking you to like the answer, but that is in fact the answer. It's all the patterns you'rs not labelling with that fuzzy evasive vague undefined label.

 

Anon wagers you can't even DEFINE the label "famefag" in a context of anonymously posted patterns on an anonymous board.

Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 3:38 a.m. No.21274075   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4091

>>21274064

Exactly as anon thought.

You can't even define the word "famefag".

 

You just made a list. Lists are not definitions. Lists are creates by implementing a definition's logic of inclusion/exclusion criteria.

 

So again anon asks, what is the definition of famefag that when implemented leads to the construction of that list?

 

Kek

Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 4:27 a.m. No.21274268   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21274218

>psychopathic diety

>cast humanity into hell on Earth

 

That's just your self-alienated psychology manifesting in a rejection/negation of your own existence in the temporal order being "subjected" to the time process at all, instead of being what your pride and megalomania deem your true rightly deserved self of being an eternal god yourself.

Life is a gift.

Negating oneself on the excuse that one is not an eternal God therefore all life is hell and a prison and an exile, is itself where the psychopathology of a "psychopathic God" narrative originates.

 

INB4 "But I'm not the oneโ€ฆsourcing the statements I myself am making"

INB4 "I am not myself"

INB4 "My internal division is a revelation of your division."

INB4 "The world of humanity is my vision of hell."

INB4 "Lying is not wrong when I/(you) am/(are) in hell."

INB4 "Killing and raping children is not wrong in hell."

INB4 "Your god did this to me."

INB4 "Hail Satan."

INB4 "Digital battlefield is exposing our inconsistent operating system."

INB4 "Sperge on QR."

Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 6:16 a.m. No.21274660   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21274633

Aaron Rupar is sexist, projecting his own sexism by falsely suggesting that dumb and crazy are only traits of one sex and not the other.

Sexist! Woman can be evil and strong and dumb and crazy just as well as men can be!

Anonymous ID: 05b089 July 23, 2024, 6:46 a.m. No.21274789   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21274782

>Allow themselves to be controlled

Partially, but a lot of it is to avoid physical, emotional and economic harassment and violence. That's real. Nobody wants the world to believe those words apply to their hearts and souls. Not even internet tough guys like you.