>>21277126 LB
>Disagree with our "woman" candidate, and you're a sexist!
Do [they] really think that this will keep us from calling out just how horrible their candidates are?
THINK AGAIN!
>>21277126 LB
>Disagree with our "woman" candidate, and you're a sexist!
Do [they] really think that this will keep us from calling out just how horrible their candidates are?
THINK AGAIN!
She's supposedly leading in Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania now.
Most likely fake, but they will make it look real so that after they steal the election, they can say, well the tides turned and she was ahead all along.
The leg spreading intensifies….
They want republicans to give up, and believe that it's over!