Anonymous ID: ca4df0 July 24, 2024, 3:28 a.m. No.21281333   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1341

>>21281316

Nah, anon didnt defend or attack any anon as a person.

Patterns.

Your claim of what anon's problem allegedly is, in fact isn't anon's problem.

No less, no more.

If you had instead asked, yes anon agrees that the ok gesture over the eye to SOME people is a demonstration of a parricular belief or devotion.

But not all.

INTENT of the symbolism is what matters most, the symbolism itself has no meaning independent of intent

Anonymous ID: ca4df0 July 24, 2024, 3:37 a.m. No.21281353   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1362

>>21281341

No, anon said anon because anon was in fact looked for.

The point is thatINTENTof the person using or duplicating or gesturing a symbol is what matters in establishing who they are and what they believe.

The symbol itself on its own is meaningless.

Proof is the thought experiment of imagining water waves crashing against a rock and due to chance made the shape of an ok hand gesture.

Intentmatters.

Anonymous ID: ca4df0 July 24, 2024, 3:54 a.m. No.21281387   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1394 >>1420 >>1457

>>21281357

Not giving a full answer to that question, but thinking one key element anon notices is when person A observes person B producing either verbal words/symbols, or written words/symbols, and person A insists on being a final judge and jury on how those symbols behave and operate such that person A denies and rejects person B's INTENT is their usage, and makes bullying harassing absolutist conclusions about what person B is actually doing and saying EVEN IF it isnt what they are intending.

 

Ever see a peraon acting as symbol tyrants, insisting that when people say certain words or make certain gestures, that they are falsely accused, slandered and smeared as "using a symbol "linked" or "associated" with yet still some other group of bad people?

 

Or when a person says "please don't say "GM", in my mind it means such and such, and my belief is most important, your intent doesnt matter".

 

When Q twice dropped "Their need for symbolism will be their downfall"โ€ฆ.that word "need" is to this anon bigly important. The NEED to treat symbolism as having an objective substance as if independent of people's wills.

Anonymous ID: ca4df0 July 24, 2024, 4 a.m. No.21281403   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1412

>>21281377

See this is an example of 'anon' who NEEDS symbolism to have meaning independent of the person's own intent, so that the person can be labelled and understood by everyone else as allegedly believing or thinking something.

Pre engagement.

Pre questioning.

Pre information disclosure from the target.

Just innuendo and labelling DEPENDENT on symbolism.

Anonymous ID: ca4df0 July 24, 2024, 4:09 a.m. No.21281423   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1431 >>1444 >>1780 >>1949 >>1971 >>2034

>>21281412

Brain Implants Allow Paralyzed Man to Walk Using His Thoughts

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/19009/

 

Neuralink demonstrated telepathyโ€™: Elon Musk reacts to video of paralyzed man playing video games with his mind

https://www.livemint.com/technology/tech-news/neuralink-demonstrated-telepathy-elon-musk-reacts-to-video-of-paralyzed-man-playing-video-games-with-his-mind-11710983531216.html

 

Not surprising the 'anon' with ancient symbolism dependency psychosis, seemingly afraid of the modern world, would be against technological marvels that make people's lives better off.

Anonymous ID: ca4df0 July 24, 2024, 4:12 a.m. No.21281438   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21281420

>After all, it's all about how you treat the symbol, right?

Yes agreed.

>I thought you meant that using symbols as authority and people doing things like mind control using symbols are the problem.

Didnt say that, but not disagreeing either.