TYB
He really is. He acts like he's taking things. From one individual. In all the years here, I've never seen someone so obsessed with trying to take from one person. He's the failfag mimic, broken muhjoo in a little psycho imitation routine.
I mean, I don't know how to take it. The clowns made an NPC based on me. Like a doll, but retarded, and theirs, not anyone else's.
No, that's not what happened at all. That was the accusation, you fuckin' chump. Why would you clowns be trying to imitate and harass and take every scrap of individuality that I show if I was fake, you fuckin' dumbfuck moran. You're sick. Seriously. The fuck is wrong with you?
Well, seeing as your game is trying to tell normies how to think I'll tell them my side and let them decide for themselves. That was an experiment with misinformation. If it was necessary, I took that as permission. Something as harmless as that only I never did die, did I, or perhaps I did in a manner that you didn't expect, maybe I was speaking in an abstract. You tried this bullshit last year, same fucking tactic, same fucking argument, same fucking failure. Fuck off, clown.
And I haven't even posted a SmokingPepe this bread and the fucking idiot is accusing me of being a fake SmokingPepe. Do these clowns think or are they just running on fumes and desperation?
>You wanted all the attention and fame.
When did I say that? I wanted shill focus. Shill focus means fame? I sure don't see any fucking benefit of this so called fame. But I sure as fuck got their attention, didn't I?
>Just not what you expected.
Kind of weak actually. I expected something moar devious than how 4-year-olds behave.
>every oldfag here knows your patterns and knows its you.
Good.
>It's always been you. The #1 slide on the board.
Yeah, that cartoon frog was the #1 slide that was posted for over half a decade before it stopped and a relentless and malicious division narrative focusing on racial stereotypes and innuendos started being posted a year ago, right?
Whatever you need to tell yourself to keep the bogeyman away, one post.
So, offering an explanation as to what the shills are doing, and maybe throwing a right-hook back, is narcissism to you? Your side can't even define a woman, for fuck's sake, how can your accusation of calling someone a narcissist be trusted when the person you're calling it isn't one? I'm done with your little hyena nips, clown.
I fail to see how pointing them out and offering a reasonable explanation as to what they're doing is narcissism in any form.
>sourced from within the Q movement
Hence their desperation to imitate one individual that posts here.
KEK. I honestly don't mind what they're doing. I'm here for something moar important than myself, and going about it in the way that works with intinct. They're consumed with imitating and trying to make their arguments around an individual. MuhJoo clowns that just swapped an ethnicity for one individual posting anonymously. "Hey, let's attack him relentlessly for a year and if he says anything about it call him a narcissist." They really are dumb.
Or maybe you're a dumbfuck doubtfag that has no power here and you're obsessed with one individual that posts anonymously here. I didn't die. That was my post. I'm the original SmokingPepe. Always have been. Always will be.
>Which is why Anons call you a famefag.
A handful of shills do, that hardly counts as Anons, let alone gives you leeway to speak for all Anons.
>Which is why Anons call you a narcissist.
A name is narcissism now, huh? Do you even think, clown? That is the best you come up with? "Let's call the guy that saw through our bullshit and makes fun of us a narcissist when we start imitating him. It's flawless." Like, seriously?
>"ANONS are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless." - Q
Angry Inch, the mimic, the failfag, the jealousest littlest bitch of them all. I got a nickname, so what, that's not my real name, but you're so consumed with it that you're losing your mind over it. What's my face? A cartoon frog? I can assure you I am not a cartoon frog and I don't even smoke cigars either. What fame? Seriously? I thought fame comes with money and prestige, not sleeping on a futon on your parents' couch and on a $700 disability check per month. How the fuck is that fame, you absolute and complete utter imbecile. You are exploring the boundaries of stupidity that no one else has right now with your accusations, pissflap.
>What a waste of trips.
They can't sustain both at equal strength. They'll settle on one or the other shortly.
Damn, running down the Alinsky rules for radicals list, and the mimics/shills are using a lot of these:
-
“Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
-
“Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
-
“Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
-
“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
-
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
-
“A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
-
“A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
-
“Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
-
“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
-
“The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
-
“If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
-
“The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
-
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
Those rules were written before autists were a thing…
Oh look, it's conveniently being posted again, that means it was never him all along using multiple devices and personas and access to unlimited VPNs. I really do think he believes no one can see him. I don't give a fuck if people can with me.