The new shill tactic is to appear as anon who is onboard with the plan, but at the same time stagnate any progress in the bread.
We really need those IP hashes to keep this going.
Anything short of John showing up on tv or Q posting in this thread isn't going to convince anyone on the main board (assuming the majority aren't already shills acting as legit anons).
We have gathered more than enough evidence to warrant more research. We need confirmation on the validity on what we have found already to show others.
So we're not going to be able to identify R on IP hashes, but by the content of his posts?
Also how would an objective fact of whether John is alive or not be apart of my (personal) journey? Aren't we all going to have to be on the same page for this to go forward?
If we are going forward with this, where are we going?
All of these posts have image names that match the same format of hex stringers that Q has named images that he has posted in the past. I do not have the list of hex strings that have been posted on the mainboard so I can't compare them to the ones posted here. If you see a (you) in my post can you tell me if you have renamed your image to match Q's posted image names or if you just made them up for whatever reason.
The common denominator in all these strings is the 13th character in the third set of number is always a "4". When someone first mentioned the pattern months ago I knew there was more to it. The hypothesis was that they were keys or related to some kind of database, but that's all speculation. I'm more interested as to why they are being posted here now.
Someone posted a hex stringer image in the main board recently here >>2164594. looking at what he posted I'm guessing he isn't a "helperAnon" or anything. I also don't know if he reused a hex stringer that Q has used or is just making them up or if it's new.
If anyone has a list of these stringers (ones posted exclusively by Q) please post them. Months ago when it was brought up there was an anon who said he was making a list and trying to figure out what they were for. Haven't heard any follow up about them on the boards since.
I am not attempting to slide or anything like that.
But there seems to be a couple of you in here that are all using the same naming convention for your images.
They all coincidentally match the pattern Q has used in the past?
I understand the phone you're using might use that naming convention for images when you save them, but I have not seen any proof of that.
I see it. hard to tell if that's the same dog though.
I'm looking for the image behind the architects left shoulder, it looks like either DJT or JFKjr sitting in a low light room on a chair.
I just went over all his posts in that thread; and wow was he ever adamant that there was no legitimacy to that post.
I think if the shills even gave this thread the slightest bit of attention it would cause alot of anons to take a second look at the evidence. something they really don't wan't anyone doing right now.
It seems if they can't control the narrative or certain facts on the boards they will act as legit anons and force topics out of discussion. In this case create another thread where the majority of anons will not see it or dismiss it.
I'm looking for the original and trying to match it. I don't think you will be able to blow that up to anything that is discernible. You'd have a better chance at scaling down the original to find a match.
Careful, I've heard of people trying this before. They were told it would amount to wire fraud if it ever saw the inside of a court.
Not saying you are wrong or anything (I'm actually surprised it worked), but you are right to be spooked.
Ok watching the scene from 1:44 - 1:50 you can see the man sitting in the chair behind the architects left shoulder is a video, not a still image. It also has a small animation overlaying the man in chair; looks like it might of been part of news broadcast or something to that effect.
I also got a quick screen of the dog that looks like it was cutoff in this pic here
oh wow I really fooled myself there, that isn't a dog. It's Neo who was caught in his bullet dodging pose.
Watched the video and he is saying "Grey Eminence". Which is saying that wikipedia describes as;
"grey eminence is a powerful decision-maker or adviser who operates "behind the scenes", or in a non-public or unofficial capacity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89minence_grise
It's also a book by Aldous Huxley.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_Eminence
Watched the video and he is saying "Grey Eminence". Which is saying that wikipedia describes as;
"grey eminence is a powerful decision-maker or adviser who operates "behind the scenes", or in a non-public or unofficial capacity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89minence_grise
It's also a book by Aldous Huxley.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_Eminence