I figured it out. Strozk thinks he is god and all the dems on the committee think so too.
Peter Strozk loves everyone, and everyone who thinks otherwise is just a detractor on some 10:00 news show.
Well there we have it. Let us all now bow down and start praying to God Peter.
Why is this committee woman talking about Obama and how he handled his presidency, like it has any bearing on Trump?
The fact that you are accusing Anon's with this blanketed statement indicates you are a racist of the most venial kind.
Thanks for outing yourself so obviously. I guess
By the way, you do realize there are black Anon's who frequent this board all the time, and they use this term freely in addressing their fellow Anons. Are you so unaware, that you dont know you are accusing these person's of being racist?
Why since your using it to divide this board right now should anyone be concerned? Looks like your taking up the responsibility of making that happen just fine.
You can have all the thoughts you want on them…does that answer your question?
What do you not get about this board that you don't realize no one here is in charge of trying to get everyone to think zombie?
No one polls the board for a thought consensus. Very MO of programming, and indoctrination. I get it your not trained to think a thought of your own yet based on research and experience you've gleaned on a subject.
What you don't get is … you just insulted the entire board by assuming they respond to sheep tactics and questions such as yours.
Looks as if I riled you. Group indoctrination is not something you can garner here. Like said before, your approach is insulting to every anon on the board.
You may want to take what you think is a subtle insult that is going over everyone's head here back to whatever liberal socialist organization you have come from. Apparently, your still yearning for having no thought of your own, and being able to develop the skill.
The board however, is adept at generating their own opinions based on the facts they amass addressing whatever subject they are exploring at the moment.
Sheila taking liberties with the truth. She is not immune to lying and miss characterizing the truth or facts.
Then ask it of that particular Anon, and not ask the board to weigh in on it. Simple enough?