>wouldn't give that homo the satisfaction of traffic engagement
Kek. There are other ways to mock and ridicule Brian Krassenstein. Have fun. o7
BEGONE, VD!
>the goyim know!
Kek
>f you fucking pieces of shit post one more picture of me here I am going to spend the last three months using the power I still have to find every last one of you and make your lives miserable.
Sup?
>You're retarded.
Yeah, I'm not the one that is part of an "or else" religious ideology, running around telling others that "God doesn't care about religion," only to call someone "retarded" when an Anon shows you a "fellow Christian" who has intolerant, supremacist religious ideology for a non-believer. What happened to "free will?" (tm) I'll poast it again for your ignorant ass.
Yeah, I don't follow any of those fairy tales, Anon, which includes Christianity. That's my "God given right" (tm), remember?
>https://www.openbible.info/topics/every_knee_will_bow
Kek. Always with the "or else." Only proves their "God" (tm) never gave them "free will" (tm). Onlyultimatums.
>God cares about love and being good to each other.
Don't need "God" (tm) for that. If you do, well, I pity you has a human being.
> it is a man made thing.
So is "God" (tm), Anon. You have the right to believe whatever you want and I'll defend your right to do so, but your belief system, itself, commands no respect.
>which is why He hates religion
That's projection, Anon. Show meanywherethat I said I "hated" religion.
>Religion is kinda like homos, it's fine just don't tell me about it.
This is a concept that religious types, specifically the Abrahamic Triumvirate, fail to grasp.
>your faggotry is shillardo
That's deflection. Can't answer, 'cos it never happened. I don't give a fuck about your "religion." Keep it out of my life and Government.
>They don't have God, so they do the Devils will
Transgenderism is Jewish in nature, Anon.
Kek. Interesting choice of memes there, Anon.
Tucker Carlson Praises Noahide Laws: "They're Great!"
Tucker Carlson praised the Noahide Laws as "great" and "very reasonable" during a recent interview with Jewish comedian Ari Shaffir.
"The non-Jews have seven laws of Noah, that's all you got to do and you get into Heaven and they're pretty easy," Shaffir told Carlson on his show July 9.
"Yeah, I've read them," Carlson interjected. "They're great!"
"They're pretty easy," Shaffir said. "Don't eat an animal while it's still living, should be a no-brainer. Don't kill…"
"Adultery," Carlson added.
"Yeah, it's not that hard and you get to go to heaven and you'll be right alongside a rabbi," Shaffir said.
"Well, not only that they're– they're like very reasonable," Carlson said. "They're all kind of rooted in natural law."
I don't know if this is Carlson doing penance for his interview with Rep. Thomas Massie or what but it's truly bizarre.
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64563
>cucker tarlson is so yesterday
Kek. So is Ari Shaffir, but he said the quiet part out loud. I will admit, though, he was funny as fuck when he was doing the Amazing Racist. Watching him go into a Jewish deli, dressed as a Catholic priest and trying to get Jews to sign a petition to have the Tribe (tm), as a collective, say Jews killed Jesus and that the Bible is correct. I don't think I had ever seen a Jewish comedian ever make fun of any religion, except for Christianity, until then.
>the rules
That's not a choice, Anon. It's anultimatium. There arenorules of your "God" (tm) for me to follow. Those are(your)rules. Why is this concept so hard to grasp?
>someone sure put a burr up your ass
I don't know why I had such a big kek when I read this and saw VD's "OH!!! THINK BIGGER!!!!" rebuttal.
>Here is a scenario for you to consider.
Why?
>Either God exists, or He doesn't.
Neither of which concerns me. It apparently concerns you, though.
> If He does exist, and you spit in His eye, how do you think that's gonna work out for ya?
Um, per your own "rules," Anon. I was given "free will" (tm). That means I have achoice. I'm not preventing anyone else from believing in "God" (tm). I'm merely using my "free will" (tm), mychoicenot to. I'm not "spitting in anyone's eye." (You), however, seem to be making judgement against another and per your "rules" (tm) that's a faux pas on your part.
> It might be worth your while to consider the consequences of both options before making a judgement call.
KMAO. Pot calling the kettle black. See above. I'm not the one breaking the "rules" (tm).
> If God does not exist, you lose nothing, but if He does exist, what do you stand to lose?
Nothing. I have achoice, remember? You keep forgetting that part. You all do.
> Choose wisely. You probably won't, but you should.
Always with the "or else" clause. You just can't fathom, stomach, nor accept that someone just doesn't want to believe what (you) do. All you Abrahamics are a cancer on humanity. You just can't keep your bullshit to yourselves. You have tomakeothers believe what you do, even if it's by threat of death. You're fuckingdisgusting.
>your stupid iscringe maximus
Kek. I'm not the faggot with religious chains around my neck, but I digress.