>>2131887
Moron typing in caps thinks he's brilliant. Did you watch Horowitz testify? He stated no bias. You state that Strzok said that he said he takes issues with the IG report. Well that's some fucking hearsay, wannabe lawfag.
>>2131887
>>2132087
Wrong.
>>2131898
Mueller fired Strzok for discovering his "personal" bias, but the IG determined that that bias did not impact Strzok's investigative decisions.
Hi James
kek
But they've been released from blackmail, so now they're just merely incompetent. Pass more laws that I don't have time to read or the rainman mind to memorize!
That isn't how testimony works. That really isn't possible according to procedure. We're not concerned here with mere public opinion and twitter meme warfare.
You forget where Horowitz said that no investigative bias resulted, which parallels Strzok's testimony. That he was, and is, biased against Trump, but it did not bias his investigations.
I'm not going to type an essay to explain it to you. We're in a different hearing now, so this testimony cannot "disprove" the IG, even if it conflicted, which it doesn't. DeSantis claiming texts cited in the IG report are evidence of investigative bias is not what the IG said, and if DeSantis thinks his mere line of questioning will prove the IG wrong, no it's not that simple.
See this:
Strzok flipped
Comey flipped
Huma flipped
Page flipped
Mueller flipped
everyone is white hat now. Yay, we win!
Oh look, a Q team member. Go celebrate on my tax dollars tonight.